Author Topic: Air Shocks revisited  (Read 3773 times)

Offline Glennster

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 879
Air Shocks revisited
« on: October 21, 2008 - 07:27:05 AM »
I know that most of you you guys have warned against Air Shocks, but I'm still considering them for a few reasons. I've just got a little 318 and I don't drive the car too hard at all. No holeshots, no drag racing, just cruising. Would Air Shocks be OK for this application, or am I just peeing into the wind?




Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Air Shocks revisited
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2008 - 07:56:26 AM »
IMO  no our roads are rough & just cruising pounds the suspension , as said before the crossmember is not very heavy & is not designed to take the loads air shocks put on it , I have seen cars with the shock holes worn oval & you can generally tell if the car had air shocks on it for a while , besides the cost of an extra leaf , new center bolts & even new U bolts is not signifiacntly more than the cost of air shocks

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline hemiken

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8785
  • Hemi-fied Mopar in Australia
Re: Air Shocks revisited
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2008 - 08:08:54 AM »
The main problem with airshocks is all in the installation. :grinyes: people have been fitting airshocks for years and i bet 99% or even more have been fitted incorrectly.  The reason that air shocks are fitted incorrectly is because they are sold as a kit and extra bits are needed.

When air shocks are installed incorrectly, they will dispurse air from one shock to the other when cornering unless they are over inflated.  In the kit you will find enough air line to connect the air shocks to one common air valve, here is where the problem lies, a shock can not have a controlled air support if it is not contained with in that one unit.  Having the common air valve, air is pushed from one shock to the other shock when cornering because of wieght.

This can be eliminated by having individual air valves per shock as single units, that is two air valves for a pair of shocks.  You can controll the amount of air that  is needed, but will need an air gauge for equal air pressure when filling.

End of the day it will be your decision which way to go. But remember never over load the air shocks as you can do damage to the cars suspension, as it will act as a solid rear if enough air is pumped in to the shocks themselves.
1970 Barracuda   (O^--^===|===^--^O)
1971 Barracuda   (O O {]{]{]|[}[}[} O O)
1970 Challenger  (O O [======R/T=] O O)
1971 Challenger  (O O ===== ===== O O)
I pay homage to the best Mopars ever built.

Offline Bullitt-

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 12167
  • Better Things To Come Member Since 2/16/06
Re: Air Shocks revisited
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2008 - 08:19:52 AM »
Don't do it, spending good money for a temporary fix...  get an add-a-leaf

http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=44537.0

Wade  73 Rallye 340..'77 Millennium Falcon...13 R/T Classic   Huntsville, AL
Screwed by Photobucket!

Offline matt63

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1855
Re: Air Shocks revisited
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2008 - 09:30:24 AM »
I threw my air shocks out this summer as they made the car ride bad.  IIRC they were very expensive and probably as much as the add a leaf and half the price of a new leaf set.
Matt in Edmonton

'68 Valiant
'73 Cuda 340 4 speed (408) SOLD

Offline Super Blue 72

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 12711
  • "Big 'n Little" Member since 8/9/05
    • Phil's Super Blue '72
Re: Air Shocks revisited
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2008 - 09:53:28 AM »
I had an '81 5th Ave that had a saggy butt and add the Superior full lenth add a leaf for like $30 since I was a poor teenager and it lifted the car up 1-2" and gave the car noticeable better handling.  :grinyes: 

My Challenger ride height is good now and the factory leaf springs are decent but I might add a full length leaf to give it a little more rake.  You can go to most local parts stores and find them in the suspension isle with the truck stuff, still around $30 or so.
1972 Dodge Challenger Rallye 340, AT, Code TB3=Super Blue, SBD=8/17/1971.  Yes, a Rallye without the fender louvers from the factory because of the body side molding option.

Pic #2 and 3 of my ARII 1/24 scale model car 

Phil in New England-Massachusetts  Always thank God for what you have!

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/456046/1972-dodge-challenger

Offline Glennster

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 879
Re: Air Shocks revisited
« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2008 - 08:37:40 PM »
You guys continue to use things like logic and real life experience to help me, I've been watching the news too much lately with the election and all. I 'm not used to a sound thought process like this.
Thanks, I appreciate the help. Add A Leaf it will be! ! ! !

Offline Bullitt-

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 12167
  • Better Things To Come Member Since 2/16/06
Re: Air Shocks revisited
« Reply #7 on: October 21, 2008 - 09:21:41 PM »
We Are Looking Out For You.   :thumbsup:
Wade  73 Rallye 340..'77 Millennium Falcon...13 R/T Classic   Huntsville, AL
Screwed by Photobucket!

Offline Glennster

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 879
Re: Air Shocks revisited
« Reply #8 on: October 21, 2008 - 09:27:17 PM »
Much appreciated Sir! ! !

Offline hemiken

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8785
  • Hemi-fied Mopar in Australia
Re: Air Shocks revisited
« Reply #9 on: October 22, 2008 - 04:34:43 AM »
 :2thumbs: air systems are good on the right application.

E-body Mopars do not come under this catagory because of the week crossmember design.
1970 Barracuda   (O^--^===|===^--^O)
1971 Barracuda   (O O {]{]{]|[}[}[} O O)
1970 Challenger  (O O [======R/T=] O O)
1971 Challenger  (O O ===== ===== O O)
I pay homage to the best Mopars ever built.

Offline Aussie Challenger

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3407
  • In Kansas loaded for Drive to West Coast.
Re: Air Shocks revisited
« Reply #10 on: October 22, 2008 - 05:28:54 AM »
   :iagree:  Hemikens explaination is right if air shockers are being installed for lifting and performance.   :2thumbs:
  Most air shockers were installed by manufacturers as a boost for the rear springs when a heavy load was being applied like a trailer, hot rodders got hold of them and changed the springing action.   :naughty:
  They shouldn't be used as a permanent solution, that is all the time, it messes up the spring rates at the rear of the car and damages the frame/floor or the top mounting point.   :stomp:   :hyper:
Dave

Offline DAYLEY/CHALLENGER

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3157
  • Still My Inspiration..1971, Rockingham, Nc
Re: Air Shocks revisited
« Reply #11 on: October 22, 2008 - 07:14:10 AM »
I guess I better revisit my set up.   When I bought the car it had air shocks.   I haven't changed them and keep them pumped up snug.  I only cruise and don't do any hard driving.   It will bark the tires easily in second and the ride is smooth.    Unless I start having trouble with them....I think I will leave them be.  There is one air valve so I do understand the air balance issue.  A lot of good info..........
Dave or David

Offline 73Chally

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2381
Re: Air Shocks revisited
« Reply #12 on: October 22, 2008 - 08:55:01 AM »
I'm with Dayley on this one.  Our car has had air shocks for 20+ years (same set) with zero problems.  I just put in XHD springs last year, and the whole rear suspension was apart and there was no warpage or other damage to the shock mounts, etc, so I put them back in.  At some point I am going to get a set of Espo springs, or custom made because I do not like the MP springs I bought (this has been covered by many others before), and I will replace them then, but otherwise they are fine.  Maybe the older ones were made better  :dunno: ?

Offline hemiken

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8785
  • Hemi-fied Mopar in Australia
Re: Air Shocks revisited
« Reply #13 on: October 22, 2008 - 09:11:24 AM »
I don't see any problems with the newer air shocks.  it all comes down to how you drive and the installation is a big factor.  For best results with air shocks, they should have their own individual valving, simple as that. :2thumbs:
1970 Barracuda   (O^--^===|===^--^O)
1971 Barracuda   (O O {]{]{]|[}[}[} O O)
1970 Challenger  (O O [======R/T=] O O)
1971 Challenger  (O O ===== ===== O O)
I pay homage to the best Mopars ever built.

Offline Moparal

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 13085
Re: Air Shocks revisited
« Reply #14 on: October 22, 2008 - 09:18:51 AM »
If your not going to carry aload, why the air shocks?  Rear shocks are a pain to put on as it is. You get a better feeling ride with hydraulic/gas shocks anyways. Don't you have an 8 1/4 rearend in your car?  I'd just go for a good premium built shock and be happy with that. 

keep it simple, your not towing a trailer/boat or loading the trunk down. An ebody is very light weight in the back.