Author Topic: Compression too high?  (Read 4954 times)

Offline Belgium Cuda

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 794
  • Living in Belgium but beeing Swedish
Compression too high?
« on: December 24, 2008 - 02:31:08 PM »
The strokerbuild for the charger is about to start but the compratio is 10.9 according to 440source, isn't that
a little bit to high? I will use the eddy heads and a engle K60 camshaft.
1970 Challenger Convertible - to become a Hemi tribute
1968 Charger R/T 500 cui stroker




Offline heminut

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2023
  • owner of the poor man's Hemi Cuda
Re: Compression too high?
« Reply #1 on: December 24, 2008 - 02:46:53 PM »
Not with aluminum heads. General consensus is that you can run one point higher with aluminum than you can with cast iron heads. You should be fine with pump premium.
1970 5.7 Hemi Cuda

Offline 73Chally

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2381
Re: Compression too high?
« Reply #2 on: December 24, 2008 - 02:57:01 PM »
Not with aluminum heads. General consensus is that you can run one point higher with aluminum than you can with cast iron heads. You should be fine with pump premium.
:iagree: However, 10.9 is pretty much the max even with aluminum heads.

Offline Moparal

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 13085
Re: Compression too high?
« Reply #3 on: December 24, 2008 - 03:49:55 PM »
 :bigsmile:  I'd love to have those SRP .030  not to high for me :2thumbs:

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Compression too high?
« Reply #4 on: December 24, 2008 - 04:12:46 PM »
Make sure you have quench you are eqivalent to approx 9.9 with iron heads & you have better fuel , 96 octane I believe so no issue with compression , & would make sure the quench is in the .040 --.050 max range even if the compression is slightly higher this way as it will kill the detonation
« Last Edit: December 24, 2008 - 05:36:51 PM by Chryco Psycho »

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline MEK-Dangerfield

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 20946
  • I don't get NO respect! Member since 1/25/2002
Re: Compression too high?
« Reply #5 on: December 24, 2008 - 04:35:21 PM »
What octane is premium gas over there in Belgium? 

Mike

1970 Challenger - SOLD
2016 SXT+.  1 of 524 SXT+'s in Plumb-crazy for 2016.

Offline Belgium Cuda

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 794
  • Living in Belgium but beeing Swedish
Re: Compression too high?
« Reply #6 on: December 25, 2008 - 01:28:37 AM »
Chryco,
How do I achieve this quench?

MEK,
We have 95 and 98 in the gasstations, however on many European Musclecarforums it's discussed if we use the same formula
and if the difference in reality is that big towards yours 91 octane. Hopefully some other members from overhere knows moore.

Since I have limited knowledge of precision tuning and building the Charger for a few cruising per year I have no problem to decrease
the comp a little bit if that makes my engine "easier" to handle. I guess a 500 stroker has torque enough.
1970 Challenger Convertible - to become a Hemi tribute
1968 Charger R/T 500 cui stroker

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: Compression too high?
« Reply #7 on: December 25, 2008 - 05:44:25 AM »
I think a higher duration cam can help to prevent pinging, or detonation, or whatever you call it.
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline Belgium Cuda

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 794
  • Living in Belgium but beeing Swedish
Re: Compression too high?
« Reply #8 on: December 25, 2008 - 06:02:47 AM »
I think a higher duration cam can help to prevent pinging, or detonation, or whatever you call it.

The Engle K60 has 288 duration
1970 Challenger Convertible - to become a Hemi tribute
1968 Charger R/T 500 cui stroker

nivvy

  • Guest
Re: Compression too high?
« Reply #9 on: December 25, 2008 - 07:32:43 AM »
with my edelbrock heads I was 10.92 to 1.. solid roller 248/254 @ .50  :working:  i ran pump gas 93 never tried any other grades....  :working:

quench was .052

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Compression too high?
« Reply #10 on: December 25, 2008 - 02:54:57 PM »
Quench is created by getting the flat part of the piston on the other side from the valve within .060 preferably closer to the .040 minimum clearance of the head so if the piston is .018 under the deck you need a .022 thick head gasket so the quench is achieved , or you can have the piston .005 under the deck & use a std 1009 FelPro gasket with .38 commpressed thickness  but I don`t recommend composition gaskets under Alum heads ever , Cometic sells a steel shim 3 piece MLS gasket  in different thicknesses to control compression & quench

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline lemming303

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1241
  • San Antonio, TX
Re: Compression too high?
« Reply #11 on: December 25, 2008 - 11:25:52 PM »
Chryco, why not composition gaskets?
Kevin

73 Challenger Rallye - first project

Offline Belgium Cuda

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 794
  • Living in Belgium but beeing Swedish
Re: Compression too high?
« Reply #12 on: December 26, 2008 - 02:19:57 AM »
Quench is created by getting the flat part of the piston on the other side from the valve within .060 preferably closer to the .040 minimum clearance of the head so if the piston is .018 under the deck you need a .022 thick head gasket so the quench is achieved , or you can have the piston .005 under the deck & use a std 1009 FelPro gasket with .38 commpressed thickness  but I don`t recommend composition gaskets under Alum heads ever , Cometic sells a steel shim 3 piece MLS gasket  in different thicknesses to control compression & quench

Achieving this quench is in fact raising my compratio then but should be no problem? :dunno: The 10.9 is calculated with .018 under
and a .039 gasket.
1970 Challenger Convertible - to become a Hemi tribute
1968 Charger R/T 500 cui stroker

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Compression too high?
« Reply #13 on: December 26, 2008 - 02:23:23 AM »
increasing the compression ratio slightly to get better quench will pay off , the quench effect in the chambers will reduce the detonation more than the lower compression , you are basically splitting hairs anyway as the quench is in the range & the compression will not go up significantly using a .018 thinner gasket

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Compression too high?
« Reply #14 on: December 26, 2008 - 02:27:20 AM »
The composition gasket doesn`t live well with the drastically different expasnsion rates of Alum & Iron , this is why every 2.2 / 2.5 engine needed the head gasket changed just about as often as tune up / spark plug changes , even the awesome 1009 FelPro gasket doesn`t live for me , the solution is the Cometic MLS gasket with 3 steel layers allowing expansion by allowing the steel shims to slide instead of tearing at the fibers of the composition gasket ultimatly failing the gasket

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t