Author Topic: What constitutes a "California" car?  (Read 2364 times)

Offline 472 R/T SE

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 225
Re: What constitutes a "California" car?
« Reply #15 on: April 16, 2009 - 05:27:26 PM »
Does it have the vent line that's mounted on the inner fender?
HELP SUPPORT THE REGISTRIES because all cars matter.

I like to sleep For I'm walking in my dreams.
Live life like every DAY is your last!




Alaskan_TA

  • Guest
Re: What constitutes a "California" car?
« Reply #16 on: April 16, 2009 - 07:20:19 PM »
N95 was required on cars sold new in California.

But, having N95 did not preclude the car from being sold elsewhere, I know of one car with it that was ordered from & delivered to Connecticut.

Offline 67vertman

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5125
  • Member since 9-23-2005
Re: What constitutes a "California" car?
« Reply #17 on: April 16, 2009 - 08:35:15 PM »
My car was built at Hamtramck and sold in California, and has spent it whole life here.

I think most people associate CA cars with not having much rust, not true in some cases.  They are not much different than cars sold else where. 



Ron - Born and raised in Southern California

I got the 1970 Cuda, but still need the hot blonde to ride shotgun!

First car -1969 Road Runner 383 4sp

Current ride - 1970 Barracuda 440-6 4 sp Dana 60  (4:10)

Offline bb71challenger

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6549
Re: What constitutes a "California" car?
« Reply #18 on: April 16, 2009 - 08:52:37 PM »
I think cars that were by the coast had a decent amount of rot as where cars that were in the desert part of the state like Ridgecrest or Trona are pretty much like cars here where I live, good metal but roasted interiors and paint.
1971 Challenger (OO==== ====OO) getting close!
1970 Challenger (OO########OO) long ways off
*Brett*

Offline Moparal

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 13085
Re: What constitutes a "California" car?
« Reply #19 on: April 16, 2009 - 09:22:19 PM »
My car came from trona.  I had to redo all the interior but zero rust

Offline bb71challenger

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6549
Re: What constitutes a "California" car?
« Reply #20 on: April 16, 2009 - 10:43:17 PM »
My car came from trona.  I had to redo all the interior but zero rust

Charles Manson territory eh? It is nice to be able to work on a car and not have bolt heads that are frozen or shrunken from rust. Sucks when  9/16 bolt head becomes not quite a 1/2 due to rust  :pullinghair:
1971 Challenger (OO==== ====OO) getting close!
1970 Challenger (OO########OO) long ways off
*Brett*

Offline LAA66

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1669
Re: What constitutes a "California" car?
« Reply #21 on: April 16, 2009 - 11:09:34 PM »
My car was built in LA but sold new in Las Cruces, New Mexico. I am trying to put it back like it originally was, except I don't have the original tag. The engine is a 383 (it's an R/T), and the reason I asked the question was I'm almost sure the car came with the three-nipple breather, as it has the five-nipple vent manifold in the back, and the four-nipple gas tank. So I figured it was an ECS car, and thought all ECS cars were California only.

 Sounds like you girl has all the nipples of a young (1970) California ride. :misbehaving: