Thanks for the input and recommendations.
It gets even more interesting "peOn" the administrator shot down the threat because "Zoomers" requested it, so much for neutrality.
In other words only himself at his leisure can post and nobody else (sounds like a dictatorship) and "Zoomers" or the plaintiff has the authority to shut down any threat at their request after 8 months of excuses. Censorship of its finest in a free country with a constitutional right of freedom a speech and expression.
I manage myself two forums and am very well aware of the extraordinary situations it can cause by certain people.
But, I would NEVER EVER ignore or downplay a problem which got addressed with hundreds of posts over a 8 months period. I would have enough intelligence and common sense to realize that we have a real problem and NOT to ban people which never used a wrong word and articulated them self on a higher grammatical and intellectual level then the administrator himself.
