Author Topic: GM crash testing from the 60's...  (Read 645 times)

Offline Super Blue 72

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 12711
  • "Big 'n Little" Member since 8/9/05
    • Phil's Super Blue '72
GM crash testing from the 60's...
« on: May 29, 2009 - 06:12:09 PM »
Amazing how these car crumple up.  I guess the bigger you are, the harder you fall.  :dunno:  Maybe due to poor design, more mass=more momentum=more force, I dunno....  :dunno:  Poor crash test dummies...  :(

http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/28/video-gm-crash-test-footage-from-the-60s-proves-weve-come-a-l/
1972 Dodge Challenger Rallye 340, AT, Code TB3=Super Blue, SBD=8/17/1971.  Yes, a Rallye without the fender louvers from the factory because of the body side molding option.

Pic #2 and 3 of my ARII 1/24 scale model car 

Phil in New England-Massachusetts  Always thank God for what you have!

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/456046/1972-dodge-challenger




Offline hebeegbz

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 385
Re: GM crash testing from the 60's...
« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2009 - 06:25:30 PM »
thanks for sharring . so many people to this day think a suv is safer than a compact but not true . the compact will total and its owner will walk away , but a suv will beat ya stupid . its all about blunt force trama ,when a car compreses you reduce momentum . again good post .
thread gone in 60 seconds

Offline Bullitt-

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 12167
  • Better Things To Come Member Since 2/16/06
Re: GM crash testing from the 60's...
« Reply #2 on: May 29, 2009 - 07:51:24 PM »
funny I did not see any GM products, mostly late 50's early 60's Plymouths & at the end a mid 60's Ford...

As to little car VS big truck....You should have seen the Malibu that plowed into the full size P/U that then hit my wife's SUV.... complete total of the Malibu, you had to look hard to find damage to the P/U bumper.  I'm sure in a different situation things could have been worse for the truck.
Wade  73 Rallye 340..'77 Millennium Falcon...13 R/T Classic   Huntsville, AL
Screwed by Photobucket!

Offline hebeegbz

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 385
Re: GM crash testing from the 60's...
« Reply #3 on: May 29, 2009 - 08:09:01 PM »
funny I did not see any GM products, mostly late 50's early 60's Plymouths & at the end a mid 60's Ford...

As to little car VS big truck....You should have seen the Malibu that plowed into the full size P/U that then hit my wife's SUV.... complete total of the Malibu, you had to look hard to find damage to the P/U bumper.  I'm sure in a different situation things could have been worse for the truck.
a pu is not an suv its a truck and if you look at safty records suvs fail badly . a truck can have little or no damage and cause neck and back injuries , but when a compact wads up you can walk away with nothing more than air bag rash . i also was in a truck that was hit so hard it z ed the frame and the camaro was wiped out the lady was unhurt and no car ,i had a chipped vertabre and two broken fingers but yahoo i still have the truck who won here.
thread gone in 60 seconds

Offline 71chally416

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3170
    • The Streetwalker
Re: GM crash testing from the 60's...
« Reply #4 on: May 29, 2009 - 08:19:06 PM »
I was re-ended by a drunk driver in a Chevy S-10 pickup when I had a 1970 Chrysler station wagon. It was not a pretty site. Bumper, grille, hood, fenders, radiator, fan, water pump and headlights. Antifreeze was pouring out and the bumper was smashed up into the grille. The Wagon had 1 damaged bumperette.  :lol: 
Once we had Ronald Reagan, Bob Hope & Johnny Cash. Now we have Obama, No Hope and No Cash!

Offline troutstreamnm

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1190
Re: GM crash testing from the 60's...
« Reply #5 on: May 30, 2009 - 09:18:30 AM »
You can see how important these tests were for engineers to develop safety systems.  Do those tests with head rests, seat belts, airbags and designed crumple zones and the dummies get out and say "WTF"  ;D
08 SRT-8 Challenger
71 GA4 Challenger
70 FK5 Charger 500