"EPA study was hidden that challenged Global Warming"
Not sure about you guys, but when I read that I would think that there was a
scientific study with actual data that challenged global warming. The "study" in question is actually a "report" (yes there's a difference) by a guy (Alan Carlin) that the EPA said this about....
“The individual in question is
not a scientist and
was not part of the working group dealing with this issue. Nevertheless the document he submitted was reviewed by his peers and agency scientists, and information from that report was submitted by his manager to those responsible for developing the proposed endangerment finding. In fact, some ideas from that document are included and addressed in the endangerment finding.”
That's some smoking gun you've got there.
One guy at the EPA, who isn't an actual scientist, who isn't actually involved in research on global warming. Or "climate change" or whatever.
But I digress. Apparently I have to go "off myself" for thinking that looking for alternative, clean energy sources to wean us off the teat of terrorist oil is a good idea. But I guess if you guys want to keep sending all your money to the Middle East you go right ahead, I'm sure OPEC won't keep raising the price on oil.
With the way the price of energy is rising right now I wouldn't be surprised if we all aren't paying an extra $175 dollars per household a year by 2020 anyway.
And I thought this
wasn't a political forum?