Author Topic: Exhaust question  (Read 2896 times)

Offline daveh

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 813
Exhaust question
« on: October 12, 2009 - 04:36:28 PM »
Hi Guys which is better an X-pipe or H-pipe configuration in a mild 340 application and why?  Thanks

Dave




Offline Jimmy

  • THE Challenge(r)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 161
Re: Exhaust question
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2009 - 04:55:54 PM »
An x-pipe is better due to the scavenging abilities the exhaust has. As one cylinder is exhausting, another is about too, and the flow from one side exhausting creates a better vacuum to pull the next exhaust cycle with the X-Pipe design. The H-Pipe design will equalize pressures from side to side, just like the X-Pipe, but the X-Pipe is more efficient in scavenging. Just my 2-cents worth.

Big Block Jimmy
1973 Challenger w/440
1967 Camaro RS w/502
1967 Mustang w/302
1965 Ford F100 w/429

Offline MEK-Dangerfield

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 20946
  • I don't get NO respect! Member since 1/25/2002
Re: Exhaust question
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2009 - 07:04:38 PM »
X-pipe is more efficient. I've heard the the H-pipe sounds better though. Either pipe would be better than none.   :2cents:

Mike

1970 Challenger - SOLD
2016 SXT+.  1 of 524 SXT+'s in Plumb-crazy for 2016.

Offline the_engineers

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2639
  • Cheap, fast, reliable...pick 2
Re: Exhaust question
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2009 - 12:40:42 PM »
Wouldn't an H-pipe help with scavenging by equalizing the pressure?
Brooks

1971 'Cuda 360
2004 Infiniti G35 6-spd Coupe
2001 Toyota Solara Convertible
2002 GMC Savana 1500 Explorer Hightop Conversion
1972 Dodge Dart Swinger...keeping the Slant.  Rocking the turbos.

Offline Bluemonster71RT

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 510
Re: Exhaust question
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2009 - 12:51:11 PM »
Yes but no. It;s just that the X flows better than an H.
1971 Challenger RT 383 4spd

Offline the_engineers

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2639
  • Cheap, fast, reliable...pick 2
Re: Exhaust question
« Reply #5 on: October 15, 2009 - 03:56:52 PM »
Fair enough.  Has anyone run across comparisons of no-crossover vs. H vs. X?
Brooks

1971 'Cuda 360
2004 Infiniti G35 6-spd Coupe
2001 Toyota Solara Convertible
2002 GMC Savana 1500 Explorer Hightop Conversion
1972 Dodge Dart Swinger...keeping the Slant.  Rocking the turbos.

Offline dodge freak 2

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 825
Re: Exhaust question
« Reply #6 on: October 15, 2009 - 07:53:08 PM »
The word I hear from some pro shop guys is the crossover pipe is overrated and more in the way like for trans removal. 

Offline Changin Gears

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1011
Re: Exhaust question
« Reply #7 on: October 15, 2009 - 08:05:20 PM »
This Pontiac test compares and H to an X.

http://www.boyleworks.com/ta400/psp/exhaust.html


The goal never changes - Stop the 60' timer with your back tires

Offline the_engineers

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2639
  • Cheap, fast, reliable...pick 2
Re: Exhaust question
« Reply #8 on: October 15, 2009 - 09:51:49 PM »
Sweet!  :thumbsup:

Thanks for posting that.
Brooks

1971 'Cuda 360
2004 Infiniti G35 6-spd Coupe
2001 Toyota Solara Convertible
2002 GMC Savana 1500 Explorer Hightop Conversion
1972 Dodge Dart Swinger...keeping the Slant.  Rocking the turbos.

Offline dodge freak 2

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 825
Re: Exhaust question
« Reply #9 on: October 17, 2009 - 11:23:59 PM »
Sweet....but how come no tests with no crossover what so ever?

Offline Aussie Challenger

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3407
  • In Kansas loaded for Drive to West Coast.
Re: Exhaust question
« Reply #10 on: October 20, 2009 - 07:44:17 AM »
  Best results are obtained with the "X" pipe.

  If you want a cool sound then the "H" pipe is best.

  No crossover pipe at all is worst option.

  There has been tests done however I don't have a reference for them, I think TTI have some info on their web site.   :cheers:
Dave

Offline shadango

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3920
Re: Exhaust question
« Reply #11 on: October 20, 2009 - 09:04:07 AM »
The word I hear from some pro shop guys is the crossover pipe is overrated and more in the way like for trans removal.

FWIW, the X pipe on my Magnaflow system isnt in the way. I was able to pull the shaft and tranny without removing the exhaust. ( I was worried about that.)

Offline 72cudamaan

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3248
Re: Exhaust question
« Reply #12 on: October 20, 2009 - 09:05:18 PM »
The X pipe or H pipe is used to increase back pressure which equates to low end torque. If you have a single plane intake ( which is not conducive to torque) and it is a street car then you would definitely want to use a crossover pipe of some sort. :2cents:
If I cant fix it, it's broke
 
Andy  (phukker whither)

Offline mojavered

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 853
  • Someday!
Re: Exhaust question
« Reply #13 on: October 21, 2009 - 11:39:29 AM »
When I was at the Mopars at the Strip the year before last, I asked the this same question to the Flowmaster gang.  Their response was that unless you had a high horse power engine, you will want to run an H-Pipe so that you can get enough bach pressurs.  Then they went on to say that a 3" pipe was way too big to run on a 440 an noone should run over a 2.5" pipe.  I was done with the conversation right there because I thought maybe he was a chebby or ford guy or just really did not know.  I asked the question, so I obviously could not argue with him.   I just politely walked away.  I still would like to see some kind of proof from the same engines with nothing changed but the X-H.
Jason

Offline cwestra

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1120
Re: Exhaust question
« Reply #14 on: October 21, 2009 - 11:59:41 AM »
Does anyone have any rough HP number gains from no cross-over, to H, to X?  I hear "better" but how much?
Corey - in Northern Indiana