So at what point does he state clearly that there is no supporting documentation other than a PROVEN BOGUS TITLE? This is why people get pissed off when sellers try to portray a car as something it is not. How about a link from the listing to the MA findings and their recanting of their previous story? I also like how he spins it, basically saying they have no proof, but gee whiz, maybe Elvis did own it. Well guess what, I have a 73 Challenger that maybe Paul Newman owned, or Michael Andretti, or maybe even Richard Petty himself. I don't know, but we have "suspicious minds".