Author Topic: Line bore 400 to 440 main size or cut the crank?  (Read 1824 times)

Offline bb71challenger

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6549
Line bore 400 to 440 main size or cut the crank?
« on: April 14, 2010 - 06:58:47 AM »
I have a nice steel 440 crank out of a 68 440. I am thinking of making a 451 with my 400. What is the best way to go about getting them to fit one another? Whats the best way to go? How much difference between the two main sizes?
1971 Challenger (OO==== ====OO) getting close!
1970 Challenger (OO########OO) long ways off
*Brett*




Offline djwhog

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 232
Re: Line bore 400 to 440 main size or cut the crank?
« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2010 - 07:54:32 AM »
This is the way to go.
When deciding what engine to drop in our 'Cuda, we first had to consider what we had available. Our goal of 10-second elapsed times pretty much dictated big-block power, and we just happened to have a 400 big-block available that didn't cost us a dime. Since making 650 hp from 400 cubes would be tough, we decided to match our 400 block with a forged 440 crank that we also had at the shop to net a displacement of 451 ci. We've found the low-deck 451 engine to be a powerful and durable combination, also making plenty of torque to get our 'Cuda moving. This combination does require that the crank's main journals be turned down to the main journal size of the 400 and some clearancing of the block in the main-webbing area, but other than that, it's a straightforward build since several manufacturers offer pistons for this application. our block would need to be machined, and for that we sent it to Chenoweth Racing Enterprises.


http://www.moparmusclemagazine.com/projectbuild/mopp_0703_barracuda_engine_build/index.html

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Line bore 400 to 440 main size or cut the crank?
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2010 - 11:57:28 AM »
it can be done either way & the block bore would seem to be the stronger way to go but most turn the crank down instead

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline ragtopdodge

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4065
Re: Line bore 400 to 440 main size or cut the crank?
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2010 - 12:59:42 PM »
If the crank needs grinding anyways, do the crank.

If it just needs a minor polishing...line bore is an option.

NOt sure which one is cheaper or stronger.
'70 318-auto Chally 'vert
'71 383-auto 'Cuda 'vert (sold)
06 300c SRT8
04 2500 QCLB 4x4 HO

Offline mopar12372

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1163
    • mopartech
Re: Line bore 400 to 440 main size or cut the crank?
« Reply #4 on: April 16, 2010 - 12:36:55 AM »
on ot the other $ is about the same
MOPARTECH.NET ( come over and visit some time )
RESTO PICTURES
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=71096.30

Offline TROUBLE987

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 496
Re: Line bore 400 to 440 main size or cut the crank?
« Reply #5 on: April 16, 2010 - 01:22:26 AM »
for what it cost to do the 440 crank..you better off just ordering a 440 source crank and your ahead..just my :2cents:

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Line bore 400 to 440 main size or cut the crank?
« Reply #6 on: April 16, 2010 - 02:05:50 AM »
the 440 Source stroker kit is a great value
you get crank, rods, pistons, brgs & rings all balanced for $1800

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline TROUBLE987

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 496
Re: Line bore 400 to 440 main size or cut the crank?
« Reply #7 on: April 16, 2010 - 12:24:00 PM »

the 440 Source stroker kit is a great value
you get crank, rods, pistons, brgs & rings all balanced for $1800
yea it really is..im so glad these guys came along..they have made building mopars alot easier on the wallet..my last 451 i built i used there high hp crank and we was spraying a 375 of nos to it and it went 8.68 no problems,still going today with the same crank..and that was 31/2 years ago..so im sold on the stuff...