Author Topic: 70 challenger motor question.  (Read 3316 times)

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: 70 challenger motor question.
« Reply #15 on: July 28, 2010 - 09:06:38 AM »
there is also www.440source.com

there is a lot of conversation about them good and bad, but if you get the good, the price is not bad  :misbehaving:
I bought a waterpump housing and pump from them. It was horrible! Had to machine 3 things on it before it would work on the motor!  I don't recomend them. Just my  :2cents:
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0




Offline D70challenger

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 197
Re: 70 challenger motor question.
« Reply #16 on: July 28, 2010 - 03:35:31 PM »
thanks for all your input guys. and thanks for the list of parts brad70. im just looking for alot of parts in general. just so i know alot is out there. i was looking at stroker kits, chryco, why did you chose the 512 over the others like the 528, 543, and the 572?


1970 Dodge Challenger
2005 Ford Mustang

sleepychallenger

  • Guest
Re: 70 challenger motor question.
« Reply #17 on: July 30, 2010 - 11:00:59 AM »
I bought a waterpump housing and pump from them. It was horrible! Had to machine 3 things on it before it would work on the motor!  I don't recomend them. Just my  :2cents:
I have heard both, but i have only gotten a flywheel from them and it seems to be good.

Offline D70challenger

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 197
Re: 70 challenger motor question.
« Reply #18 on: August 10, 2010 - 02:35:35 PM »
hey guys, came across this on ebay. since he is withing a driving distance for me i thought i would consider this. what do you guys think? would the 543 stroker kit work with this block?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=220647726465&viewitem=&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWAX%3AIT

obviously i wouldnt use the transmission though.
« Last Edit: August 10, 2010 - 03:03:11 PM by D70challenger »


1970 Dodge Challenger
2005 Ford Mustang

Offline MEK-Dangerfield

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 20946
  • I don't get NO respect! Member since 1/25/2002
Re: 70 challenger motor question.
« Reply #19 on: August 10, 2010 - 04:08:29 PM »
It looks like a good deal to me right now sitting at $255. The good news is it runs and isn't locked up. I would be curious to know why 2 plugs keep getting fouled, but since you will be rebuilding it, that doesn't matter.

I don't know the answer to this question, but if those motor home exhaust manifolds are the same as the ones they put on the 440 cars, you can sell them for some $$$ to help pay for the headers that I assume you would use on your 543 stroker.

Mike

1970 Challenger - SOLD
2016 SXT+.  1 of 524 SXT+'s in Plumb-crazy for 2016.

Offline D70challenger

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 197
Re: 70 challenger motor question.
« Reply #20 on: August 10, 2010 - 04:47:37 PM »
can i not use the 440 headers if i get a 543 stroker? lso, will the 906 heads work with the 543 stroker kit?
« Last Edit: August 10, 2010 - 06:02:52 PM by D70challenger »


1970 Dodge Challenger
2005 Ford Mustang

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: 70 challenger motor question.
« Reply #21 on: August 11, 2010 - 03:06:43 AM »
thanks for all your input guys. and thanks for the list of parts brad70. im just looking for alot of parts in general. just so i know alot is out there. i was looking at stroker kits, chryco, why did you chose the 512 over the others like the 528, 543, and the 572?

 We have built 23 engines using the 440 source parts , no issue as long as your machinist checks everything over , the pistons, rings & brgs are all top quality parts , the cranks & rods are made by 440 source , I would not base the quality of the parts on the replacement water pump housings .
 The reason I generally choose the 512 combo is it retains most of the rod ratio while removing 7lbs from the rotating mass , more CI doesn`t nessisarily increase the power& it will reduce the rod ratio , & push the oil ring up into the piston pin & creates more of a short life race engine than  longer life street performer but still has massive torque .
 the 906 heads can be used as well as the headers designed for a 440  But I would not recommend it even extremely ported the flow #s on 906 heads would limit the power , even more os with the bigger 543 over the smaller 512 " build , if you go to a better head usually the exhaust ports are raised which causes problems with header fitment ,usually this requires special headers to match the heads 

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t