Mufflers? Exhaust?

Author Topic: Mufflers? Exhaust?  (Read 18668 times)

Offline mopar12372

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1163
    • mopartech
Re: Mufflers? Exhaust?
« Reply #30 on: October 05, 2010 - 01:33:44 AM »
i vote hooker aero chamber

« Last Edit: October 05, 2010 - 01:40:34 AM by mopar12372 »
MOPARTECH.NET ( come over and visit some time )
RESTO PICTURES
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=71096.30




Offline GranCuda1970

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5515
  • Rev 20:4. Mat 6:33 John 1:3 Mat 26:41
Re: Mufflers? Exhaust?
« Reply #31 on: October 05, 2010 - 01:46:04 AM »
Good sound but I really like it when the exhaust trumpets at high reving kinda rolls it's tounge to say!!

Offline Aussie Challenger

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3407
  • In Kansas loaded for Drive to West Coast.
Re: Mufflers? Exhaust?
« Reply #32 on: October 05, 2010 - 05:51:56 AM »
The X pipe is more expensive and you will get a benefit anyway and if done now it will be ready for when you do the next upgrade. The H pipe is easy and cheap to have installed, this should be done at least.   :cheers:
Dave

Offline 73Chally

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2381
Re: Mufflers? Exhaust?
« Reply #33 on: October 05, 2010 - 08:27:13 AM »
X pipes and H pipes are meant primarily for sound benefits, with each having different characteristics.  H pipe will give little to no performance gains, and the X pipe will help improve flow a little, but probably not enough to be noticed in a street engine.  The X pipe would also need to be a custom setup to see the best gain, because the distance it needs to be away from the engine will vary with every build.  The over-the-counter setups are basically an approximation of the best location.  Unless you're building a high horsepower street/strip engine, your best bet is to go with the H pipe.  X pipes can also be a royal PITA when working around the transmission and drive shaft.

Offline GranCuda1970

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5515
  • Rev 20:4. Mat 6:33 John 1:3 Mat 26:41
Re: Mufflers? Exhaust?
« Reply #34 on: October 05, 2010 - 08:45:48 AM »
Very Informative, thanks I was gonna throw the stock exhaust sytem in resonators and mufflers saw the kits were made somewhere in Roseburg Oregon included all, hangers tips , pipes for stock applications coming off the HP manifolds. But it do like the sound of some of these Other systems. I heard the good wrap of a flowmaster coming off of a 440-6 and I needed a towel afterwords. :bigsmile:

Offline nqkjw

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 512
Re: Mufflers? Exhaust?
« Reply #35 on: October 05, 2010 - 09:00:56 AM »
My 69 notch barracuda with twin 4" flowmaster X-pipe system.
Engine is 400hp with 8.4:1 and MoparPerformance 0.484" lift cam exiting through 2" primary headers.

Burnouts are cool but Traction is the Action

Offline boxfox

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 57
Re: Mufflers? Exhaust?
« Reply #36 on: October 06, 2010 - 05:35:03 PM »
For those of you who went with the Dynomax Super Turbo mufflers, I was just wondering why you choose the Super Turbo mufflers over the Thrush Turbo mufflers?

Offline 1970 RT Challenger 1970

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 774
Re: Mufflers? Exhaust?
« Reply #37 on: October 06, 2010 - 09:30:21 PM »
For a real cheap thrill, get a set of Cherry Bomb Mufflers, I had a set years ago and they rust out within a year. After pulling a 6000 rpm shift with a SB Chevy Camaro, there was a Boooooom and they blew out and as I looked in my rearview mirror, there was muffler shrapnel flying all over the road!

Offline G_Man440

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 37
Re: Mufflers? Exhaust?
« Reply #38 on: October 07, 2010 - 01:22:24 AM »
My muffler shop warned me not to buy Dynomax. I bought them anyway because I  liked the sound. They were rattling after 1000 miles because the spot welds inside broke loose and I had to replace them. Fortunately the place warrantied them with a big fat "I told you so". I put on the 3 chamber Flowmaster and have had no problems so far. I was hoping they would be quieter but they are louder. No reason to hook up the radio now.
70 Challenger R/T, 440, 727, AC

Offline mopar12372

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1163
    • mopartech
Re: Mufflers? Exhaust?
« Reply #39 on: October 07, 2010 - 02:16:34 AM »
X pipes and H pipes are meant primarily for sound benefits, with each having different characteristics.  H pipe will give little to no performance gains, and the X pipe will help improve flow a little, but probably not enough to be noticed in a street engine.  The X pipe would also need to be a custom setup to see the best gain, because the distance it needs to be away from the engine will vary with every build.  The over-the-counter setups are basically an approximation of the best location.  Unless you're building a high horsepower street/strip engine, your best bet is to go with the H pipe.  X pipes can also be a royal PITA when working around the transmission and drive shaft.
i am sorry to inform you but the information that was given to you is wrong (very). there has been tons of dyno tests done on both with remarkable results . the x pipe (any brand ) mounted as close to the front of the vehicle (hotter exhaust gasses ) will promote better scavangeing and allow the engine to work better.the h pipe will work better with engines with less cubic inches . remember the lower your compression the smaller the exhaust pipe should be too .  imop
« Last Edit: October 07, 2010 - 02:18:51 AM by mopar12372 »
MOPARTECH.NET ( come over and visit some time )
RESTO PICTURES
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=71096.30

Offline boxfox

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 57
Re: Mufflers? Exhaust?
« Reply #40 on: October 25, 2010 - 05:09:33 PM »
Alright guys thanks for all the suggestions and information, I've got an appointment setup with Hogan Muffler and Brake in Topeka, the only place in Kansas with a mandrel bender it seems, going to have them take care of the work, getting 2.5" mandrel bent pipes an X pipe and going to give the Dynomax VT mufflers a try. I'll let you know how it turns out sounding in the end.

Offline 360FISH

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 705
  • BS23H3B567746
Re: Mufflers? Exhaust?
« Reply #41 on: November 08, 2010 - 01:24:13 AM »
 :popcorn:
interested in knowing what happens...

Alan
1973 ‘Cuda   Semi-Pro Touring
360 SB - 518/OD auto tranny - FAST EZ EFI - Edelbrock Fuel sump - HHR fan
Hella H4 headlights on relays - 97 Dodge Avenger seats - Chin spoiler - Bumpers pulled in to ’72 offset

Build: http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=74674.0

Offline ShelbyDogg

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5007
Re: Mufflers? Exhaust?
« Reply #42 on: November 08, 2010 - 04:20:00 PM »
I put in my H pipe in the mid-80s and still have the same exhaust today. 2-1/2 all the way back to stock mufflers and no resonators under the back seat area.  Loud enough to get attention but quiet enough to drive 17 hours straight.   I noticed that when I put in the H-pipe, I don't get the annoying rapping exhaust sound in high rpm bursts that all Mopars seem to make.
Rob

3 E-bodies, Megasquirt-1v3.0, Edelbrock Pro-Flo-1, Holley C950, FAST EZ-EFI; say no to carbs...yes to throttle bodies

My Pace Car restoration thread:
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=44869.0


Offline the_engineers

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2639
  • Cheap, fast, reliable...pick 2
Re: Mufflers? Exhaust?
« Reply #43 on: November 08, 2010 - 05:45:19 PM »
I'm running TTi 2.5" with Dynomax Turbos on a .030+ 360.  The system has an H pipe and sounds fantastic.  Great fit and finish.  No complaints here.
Brooks

1971 'Cuda 360
2004 Infiniti G35 6-spd Coupe
2001 Toyota Solara Convertible
2002 GMC Savana 1500 Explorer Hightop Conversion
1972 Dodge Dart Swinger...keeping the Slant.  Rocking the turbos.

Offline mopar12372

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1163
    • mopartech
Re: Mufflers? Exhaust?
« Reply #44 on: November 08, 2010 - 10:57:01 PM »
sound clips plz : :bigsmile:
MOPARTECH.NET ( come over and visit some time )
RESTO PICTURES
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=71096.30