Author Topic: U joint ?  (Read 2211 times)

Offline rb70

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 145
U joint ?
« on: November 23, 2010 - 12:05:29 PM »
How do I tell if I have the 7260 or 7290 style ujoints?

8 3/4 - 3.23 gears

I searched and could not find where anyone specified a diameter for big yokes, versuses small yokes.




Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: U joint ?
« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2010 - 12:12:50 PM »
7260 is 2.125 inside the ears
7290 is 2.625 inside the ears

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline rb70

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 145
Re: U joint ?
« Reply #2 on: November 23, 2010 - 02:11:07 PM »
Thanks!

So the 8 3/4 rearend came with both types of ujoints?
« Last Edit: November 23, 2010 - 05:19:18 PM by rb70 »

Offline Katfish

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3733
  • 70 Challenger
Re: U joint ?
« Reply #3 on: November 23, 2010 - 02:21:58 PM »

Offline rb70

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 145
Re: U joint ?
« Reply #4 on: November 23, 2010 - 05:17:51 PM »
Why would I want/need to do this conversion?

Offline Moparal

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 13085
Re: U joint ?
« Reply #5 on: November 23, 2010 - 05:19:57 PM »
Why would I want/need to do this conversion?


You tell us, it is your question. Is something not right?  Dana 60 is a 7290

Offline rb70

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 145
Re: U joint ?
« Reply #6 on: November 23, 2010 - 06:49:11 PM »

You tell us, it is your question. Is something not right?  Dana 60 is a 7290

What??
I was responding to Kat and why I need the conversion ujoints.

Offline Bullitt-

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 12167
  • Better Things To Come Member Since 2/16/06
Re: U joint ?
« Reply #7 on: November 23, 2010 - 06:59:28 PM »
You would only need the conversion joint if you had changed some part, like the rear end, & had mismatched sized yokes...if their the same size just get the appropriate sized replacement.
Wade  73 Rallye 340..'77 Millennium Falcon...13 R/T Classic   Huntsville, AL
Screwed by Photobucket!

Offline sadil340

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1562
Re: U joint ?
« Reply #8 on: November 23, 2010 - 09:41:54 PM »
Actually my 340 car has the 7260 to 7290 conversion joint for the slip yoke and it is the factory part. I think it's because the 8 3/4 rear has the large 7290 joint so both ends of the driveshaft have the same large joint. Since it is a small block the trans slip yoke uses the smaller 7260 joint hence the need to covert the small slip yoke to the large driveshaft.
1970 Cuda 340 4-speed
3:55 SureGrip
Owned since 1974
Bought from original owner

Alaskan_TA

  • Guest
Re: U joint ?
« Reply #9 on: November 23, 2010 - 10:03:56 PM »
The conversion joint was never a factory part as far as I know?  :dunno:

Some 1970 340 cars (AARs & T/As included) used the small joint in front & the big one in the rear.

Offline sadil340

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1562
Re: U joint ?
« Reply #10 on: November 24, 2010 - 11:16:23 AM »
The conversion joint was never a factory part as far as I know?  :dunno:

Some 1970 340 cars (AARs & T/As included) used the small joint in front & the big one in the rear.
You could be right Barry, I just don't remember anyone changing out the front joint.
1970 Cuda 340 4-speed
3:55 SureGrip
Owned since 1974
Bought from original owner