EFI install observation: FAST vs Edlebrock 2 Pro Flo 3550

Author Topic: EFI install observation: FAST vs Edlebrock 2 Pro Flo 3550  (Read 12177 times)

Offline DocMel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 828
EFI install observation: FAST vs Edlebrock 2 Pro Flo 3550
« on: February 24, 2011 - 12:05:19 PM »
     Highlights of Installing the FAST EFI with some comparison notes to the Edlebrock Pro Flo 2 3550  EFI  Seeing some recent posts on EFI in general, thought Id add my own post:

I have installed both the Edlebrock PRO FLO 2 3550 and just installed the FAST EFI:    In this post, I’m not trying to compare carbs to EFI:  Either you will try EFI or you wont.  I’ve been wrenching for over 25 years now and have went basically went thru every make/model of carbs out there, tuned them ,etc.   But I didn’t get into EFI until about 7 years ago with the Edlebrock Pro Flo.  I do all my own work, so the observations are hands on:  I’ll even mention mistakes I made....

My Edlebrock EFI was installed on a 1970 Chevy BB about 7 yrs ago:  I just installed the FAST on a 1968 440 in my 71 Cuda:  Both were bone stock except for basic rebuild, with very mild cams and headers so the comparisons should be close.  Make/model of the engines are really a non-issue in this post:  What I’m trying to explain is how easy or hard these 2 systems are to install, some pitfalls, costs, etc   

Edlebrock Pro Flo:  These systems go for about $3,000.   Basically, you get a new intake manifold and everything you need for the EFI.  There is also a mod for your current distributor;  So basically you can run your oem distro, points, mag p/u:  Any distributor.

Installation: First, you need to know your cam specs.  You send specs and the included chip back to Edlebrock, and the chip for the EFI brain is sent back to you (in 2 days) for the initial parameters to be loaded correctly for your cam profile into the EFI ECU

Like most EFI'S  (FAST and the Pro Flo), the large amount of wire looms and finding a place to mount your ecu, fuel press regulator can be a pain.  But with creativity, you can make it happen and make it look fairly clean

Fuel Lines:  You must install a feed and return line.  Don’t even think about using your original fuel lines if they are 5/16.  I tried it, and no way will you circulate enough fuel.  Instructions clearly state use 3/8”.  I tried to use 5/16 and I kept running lean IAW the hand held.  But when I went 3/8, no prob

Fuel lines take longest to install on any EFI conversion kit.  It’s just time consuming, not hard:  If you don’t have a return fuel nipple on your gas tank to return the fuel in the EFI fuel system, you will have to install one. 

Finding a place to install the fuel pump is fairly easy:   Just mount in a location IAW instructions.  Some say you need a baffled gas tank to keep fuel in place during hard accel/driving styles  to keep the EFI fuel system feed:  I have never installed a baffled gas tank or had one, and I have never had a prob

The Pro Flo kit DOES NOT INCLUDE EFI FUEL LINES:  That can get expensive per foot outside of the 3K you just spent

O2 sensor fitting must be installed in your exhaust system:  I placed mine in the  far end of the header collector, about 2 inches from where the exhaust attaches  (So you need a little welding done)

You must remove your intake manifold and replace it with the e brock intake.  Installation is straight  forward.  But if you have hood clearance issues, this system will not help you:  It sits fairly tall, at least 2-3” higher than a stock intake 

Distributor:  Chances are, you will have to mod your distributor:  The kit includes the mods required.  Yes, some grinding may be required to fit the ebrock p/u inside the distributor, but once done, you cant tell from the outside, except for non stock appearing wires leading from the distro
When ready. You must have a pc to load the EFI systems ECU.  Once that is done, all programming is done from the detachable handheld programmer
I had a four speed, so no kick down issues to work out:  I believe I needed to get a throttle cable adapter mount to 4150 style, which was no big deal .
I had a four speed, so no kick down issues to work out
The hand held is fairly straight forward, BUT:  The screens are somewhat confusing to tell what data is what.  The instructions are little difficult to follow:  But you can load multiple settings once you figure it out for multiple driving styles:  Economy, perf, etc.  You can adjust on the fly, or just enter a pre loaded
Parameter and you are good to go.  F/A ratios for about any driving style/range can be set as needed
E brock tech line:  A little spotty at times.  But I did get what I needed

 Between the carb that was originally on the motor (well tuned) and the E Brock EFI:  Night and day, period:  Instant start up and idle in the hottest or coldest weather.  The system will tune itself immediately for every altitude.   Seat of the pants was very noticeable.  Its all about fuel efficiency: 

FAST EFI:  This has got to be one of the easiest EFIs to install:  Goes for about $2100 for the master kit.  I got mine on ebay thru a FAST vendor for $1800 shipped. 
The EFI unit bolts rights onto your existing intake.  No mods required to your existing distro.  No PC and no program chips to consider, in order to initially load the ECU or hand held programmer
Same issues with fuel lines and wiring:  Can be messy, takes a while to get the fuel lines installed.  You need a 3/8 return fuel line nipples at the gas tank.  Mounting the EC U and fuel press regulator can be challenge to find mounting places.  Os sensot mount is the same as E brock
Every single AN fitting and the EFI fuel lines are included.  But not enough fuel line was included to do my Cuda.  I was short about 2 feet or so.
Installation instructions are EXTREMELY clear.  So was intial start up.  The hand held is very easy to decipher, and walk thru instructions are very clear.  I didnt need the tech line, so I cant comment on the FAST tech line.   
Again, seat of the pants/efficiency of fuel was very noticeable:  Start up/idle is spot on ,and the system tunes itself( as you loaded it) and tunes instantly as driving conditions change. This system can be installed by about anyone
I’m running a 727, and the stick kickdown fit right on.  Hood clearance is NOT an issue as the system is the same height as a 4150.  I’m running my 4 barrel shaker with no mods or problems
I know this post is a very, very brief overview:  If you want to ask specific questions, plz do so right on this post  (not by private msg) so everyone can see the input.  Again, this was a very brief comparison, and the intent was not to really compare the 2 systems or compare EFI against carbs, but to see what I encountered in both systems. 
On both systems I drive from approx 12000 ft down to basically sea level, and they run like raped apes as they tune themselves   for long drives, I can lean the misture out in about 1 minute, and really save on the gas.   I can even pre load dif settings for dif types or driving:  Just hit a button and I’m there











Offline Challenger III

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1290
Re: EFI install observation: FAST vs Edlebrock 2 Pro Flo 3550
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2011 - 12:18:01 PM »
Thank you for taking the time to post this! I am in the "Research" stage right now for my project.
Mike    Yakima, Washington

Resto Thread:  http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=66668.0

Offline DocMel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 828
Re: EFI install observation: FAST vs Edlebrock 2 Pro Flo 3550
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2011 - 07:48:47 PM »
You are welcome  Again, its a very broad outline, but Ill answer any specific questions if needed

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: EFI install observation: FAST vs Edlebrock 2 Pro Flo 3550
« Reply #3 on: November 29, 2011 - 01:44:29 PM »
Thanks for posting this! Great info! I'm "researching" the posibilities of turning a STR-14 intake into a EFI system. I have never really worked on any EFI system before so I'm a little intimidated. I was looking on the FAST web site, looking at how I could mount the 8 injectors in the intake. Lots to learn...... :grinyes:
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: EFI install observation: FAST vs Edlebrock 2 Pro Flo 3550
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2011 - 07:28:29 AM »
I far prefer the multi port efi to throttle body injection , Eddy has a Victor intake kit with injector ports already drilled & it is supplied with rails , Throttle body injection still has the fuel dist problems in poor intakes

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: EFI install observation: FAST vs Edlebrock 2 Pro Flo 3550
« Reply #5 on: December 01, 2011 - 07:33:15 AM »
I far prefer the multi port efi to throttle body injection , Eddy has a Victor intake kit with injector ports already drilled & it is supplied with rails , Throttle body injection still has the fuel dist problems in poor intakes

With the STR intake I would only consider multiport for sure.  :grinyes:  Looks like about 3K ... :-\
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: EFI install observation: FAST vs Edlebrock 2 Pro Flo 3550
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2012 - 09:16:39 AM »
I have a couple of questions ..
is the fast throttle body the same (or made by) as the Accufab throttle body? They sure look the same?
Secondly... are they shorter than a standard Holley? They look like they are? Where I'm going with this is.. I'm planning on a STR-14 intake and it is taller than the Holley Street Dominator I'm currently using, and the shorter height ( if any?  :dunno: ) would be helpful!
 
http://www.fuelairspark.com/Products/FS-'Single%20Plane%20EFI'-1.aspx

http://www.accufabracing.com/index.php/Throttle-Bodies/Four-Barrel-4150/4500.html

Thanks Brad
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline ragtopdodge

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4065
Re: EFI install observation: FAST vs Edlebrock 2 Pro Flo 3550
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2012 - 12:55:11 PM »
I have a couple of questions ..
is the fast throttle body the same (or made by) as the Accufab throttle body? They sure look the same?
Secondly... are they shorter than a standard Holley? They look like they are? Where I'm going with this is.. I'm planning on a STR-14 intake and it is taller than the Holley Street Dominator I'm currently using, and the shorter height ( if any?  :dunno: ) would be helpful!
 
http://www.fuelairspark.com/Products/FS-'Single%20Plane%20EFI'-1.aspx

http://www.accufabracing.com/index.php/Throttle-Bodies/Four-Barrel-4150/4500.html

Thanks Brad


FAST has built-in injectors.  Those Accufab throttle bodies do NOT include the injectors.  To use the latter, you'll need to weld-in injector bungs and install fuel rails.  Plus, you really want to do this on a single-plane intake.  This will add at least $500 to your costs.


I'm VERY interested in either the Projection III or the new MSD unit, which both can be had WITHOUT needing a return line.  Both are about $2k.

I'm wondering even if you DO get a kit needing a return line, can this be minimized by using the Corvette C5 combination fuel filter, regulator and mount it somewhat close to the tank, not needing a whole return line?



'70 318-auto Chally 'vert
'71 383-auto 'Cuda 'vert (sold)
06 300c SRT8
04 2500 QCLB 4x4 HO

Offline bad440

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: EFI install observation: FAST vs Edlebrock 2 Pro Flo 3550
« Reply #8 on: February 14, 2012 - 03:14:40 PM »
I agree that multi-port is a more accurate fuel delivery for injection, but I am leaning towards a new system made by Atomic EFI by MSD which requires no return fuel line and which considerably simplifies the job. My 440 ran very strong with a 750 Holley but am tired of poor cold starts and driveability problems associated with carburetors. Thanks for that info on EFI installs, may make a few more people look into these, myself included.
Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Offline Challenger III

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1290
Re: EFI install observation: FAST vs Edlebrock 2 Pro Flo 3550
« Reply #9 on: February 14, 2012 - 05:33:31 PM »
I have a couple of questions ..
is the fast throttle body the same (or made by) as the Accufab throttle body? They sure look the same?
Secondly... are they shorter than a standard Holley? They look like they are? Where I'm going with this is.. I'm planning on a STR-14 intake and it is taller than the Holley Street Dominator I'm currently using, and the shorter height ( if any?  :dunno: ) would be helpful!
 
http://www.fuelairspark.com/Products/FS-'Single%20Plane%20EFI'-1.aspx

http://www.accufabracing.com/index.php/Throttle-Bodies/Four-Barrel-4150/4500.html

Thanks Brad
  I believe Fast uses Accufab throttle bodies for the port injection.  Looks like they are a little cheaper also.  :naughty: I don't know how how tall they are. I think Hemiken has them on his car.  :dunno:

Edit:  HemiDog has the engine I was thinking about.  :dupe:
« Last Edit: February 14, 2012 - 06:32:02 PM by Challenger III »
Mike    Yakima, Washington

Resto Thread:  http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=66668.0

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: EFI install observation: FAST vs Edlebrock 2 Pro Flo 3550
« Reply #10 on: February 14, 2012 - 08:19:30 PM »
FAST has built-in injectors.  Those Accufab throttle bodies do NOT include the injectors.  To use the latter, you'll need to weld-in injector bungs and install fuel rails.  Plus, you really want to do this on a single-plane intake.  This will add at least $500 to your costs.




Are you sure about that? This link shows a throttle body that looks just like the Accufab unit? :dunno:

http://www.fuelairspark.com/Products/FS-'Single%20Plane%20EFI'-1.aspx
I know the do make aTBI style throttle body  but thats not the one in the picture I'm looking at.
I'm going to machine my own rails and "stands" to hold the injectors to the STR intake. Plan is to hide it all under the lid and have the wiring and fuel lines go out the back.
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline cudagirl4406pk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1620
  • Yes i am a Girl and No you cant drive my CUDA
    • Garageartmusclecars
Re: EFI install observation: FAST vs Edlebrock 2 Pro Flo 3550
« Reply #11 on: February 14, 2012 - 11:05:53 PM »
I am going with the new atomic efi from MSD looks to be a nice product.


michele
Yes i am a girl and no you cant drive my MOPAR :)

Offline ragtopdodge

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4065
Re: EFI install observation: FAST vs Edlebrock 2 Pro Flo 3550
« Reply #12 on: February 15, 2012 - 02:12:15 AM »
I guess we should clarify WHICH FAST system the OP was talking about.

I was referring to the all-in-one EZ http://www.fuelairspark.com/ezefi/default.asp

But FAST makes a full-blown computer system where you'd add your own (or theirs) throttle body, fuel rails, injectors, mounted on a single plane:  http://www.fuelairspark.com/Products/FS-'XFI%202.0%20Electronic%20Fuel%20Injection'-0.aspx
'70 318-auto Chally 'vert
'71 383-auto 'Cuda 'vert (sold)
06 300c SRT8
04 2500 QCLB 4x4 HO

Offline TROUBLE987

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 496
Re: EFI install observation: FAST vs Edlebrock 2 Pro Flo 3550
« Reply #13 on: February 16, 2012 - 11:38:17 AM »
just a quick question,what about if your running a shaker hood?i have a big block 440 and was putting a shaker hood on it.will all these system still work?

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: EFI install observation: FAST vs Edlebrock 2 Pro Flo 3550
« Reply #14 on: February 16, 2012 - 12:03:41 PM »
I guess we should clarify WHICH FAST system the OP was talking about.

I was referring to the all-in-one EZ http://www.fuelairspark.com/ezefi/default.asp

But FAST makes a full-blown computer system where you'd add your own (or theirs) throttle body, fuel rails, injectors, mounted on a single plane:  http://www.fuelairspark.com/Products/FS-'XFI%202.0%20Electronic%20Fuel%20Injection'-0.aspx


 :lol:  Opps your right! My bad :-[  I was looking at the second link that you posted.
Anyone know the height of that set up? Reason I ask is I'll be "fighting" for clearance and the lower the better for me. The STR intake is taller than the Holley Street dominator I'm using now and the air cleaner base I'm using now "just" fits. I'm using a single 4bbl base from these guys.
http://hybrid-fiberglass-solutions.com/home.html
 I'll likely have to use the base off a 440 road runner set up that won't seal to the  T/A hood , but will allow it to mount higher up into the scoop?


Trouble987.... I have no idea as I've read some people who have trouble mounting a aftermarket aluminum intake and a  Holley under a shaker base? ( too tall?)  :clueless:
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0