Author Topic: To stroke or not to stroke.....  (Read 2067 times)

Offline 67vertman

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5125
  • Member since 9-23-2005
To stroke or not to stroke.....
« on: March 04, 2011 - 10:17:41 PM »
I am moving closer to starting my 440 engine build.  And, the engine builder say if I am going with a new rotating assembly I may as well go with a stroker.  Is it worth the extra $$ or not on a mild street motor?
« Last Edit: March 04, 2011 - 10:42:36 PM by 67vertman »



Ron - Born and raised in Southern California

I got the 1970 Cuda, but still need the hot blonde to ride shotgun!

First car -1969 Road Runner 383 4sp

Current ride - 1970 Barracuda 440-6 4 sp Dana 60  (4:10)




Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: To stroke or not to stroke.....
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2011 - 10:23:37 PM »
I assume it's a big block your building?
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline 67vertman

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5125
  • Member since 9-23-2005
Re: To stroke or not to stroke.....
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2011 - 10:42:03 PM »
I assume it's a big block your building?

 :bricks1: opps, yes a big block!

I updated the post.  :2thumbs:



Ron - Born and raised in Southern California

I got the 1970 Cuda, but still need the hot blonde to ride shotgun!

First car -1969 Road Runner 383 4sp

Current ride - 1970 Barracuda 440-6 4 sp Dana 60  (4:10)

Offline jimynick

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4512
Re: To stroke or not to stroke.....
« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2011 - 12:56:45 AM »
Well, the old saying always goes.."there's no replacement, for displacement" The prices are so good these days that the thought, "why not" comes to mind. No one says you have to build a pro stock engine and those 60 or so more inches will put a smile on your face one day.  :2cents:

Offline Road_Runner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1825
  • Mopar Owner & Standard Bearer Since 1974
Re: To stroke or not to stroke.....
« Reply #4 on: March 05, 2011 - 05:22:23 AM »
I'm going to go the other way and say 500 HP  should be a relatively easy target out of a nice 440 with decent heads etc., so I say don't stroke it.  I know stroking motors is the current craze, but as I recall 440s back in the day, their longer stroke already had them at somewhat of a disadvantage to my high HP 383 which revved way quicker than they did.  Not saying my 383 made more HP, but with a decent converter & rear gear I jumped into my power band a lot quicker than they did.  So adding even more stroke would seem to me to make that worse unless you were going the high HP route with big cam, high compression and steep rear gear.  I'll be interested to see what others say about this, I could be off base on my thinking.

Later, Jim
1970 383 Roadrunner Tor Red
1973 318 Barracuda Mist Green
2014 Mustang GT/CS Convertible All Black

Offline Aussie Challenger

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3407
  • In Kansas loaded for Drive to West Coast.
Re: To stroke or not to stroke.....
« Reply #5 on: March 05, 2011 - 06:14:08 AM »
If it isn't going to see any serious racing then it really is a waste of the extra money, bragging rights can always be a big plus but then who knows what is inside, nobody can tell from the outside unless you are running external oiling.   :2cents:
Dave

Offline Katfish

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3733
  • 70 Challenger
Re: To stroke or not to stroke.....
« Reply #6 on: March 05, 2011 - 06:47:59 AM »
 :iagree:

Save your money, I voted yes before I knew it was a 440.  Small block - YES, 440 - save your money.

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: To stroke or not to stroke.....
« Reply #7 on: March 05, 2011 - 07:39:35 AM »
I'm 90% sold on the 451" combo for a street engine . Sounds like we have the same goals in mind, HP,Torque wise? So far I have a block and aluminum heads and a timing gear set up. I agree with what was said in that with the price of stroker kits....why wouldn't ya?
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline moparmaniac59

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3772
  • Drive it like ya stole it!
Re: To stroke or not to stroke.....
« Reply #8 on: March 05, 2011 - 08:24:26 AM »
I stroked my 440 and love it. I know folks will talk bad about all the rotating mass of a 440 and a 400 is a superb motor to build a stroker with (no doubt) BUT.... with the motor I built, yes it has a lot of rotating mass, but doesn't have to turn nowhere near the rpm as the smaller motors to make peak horsepower. So it's a trade off. My motor made 615 HP at 5400 rpm. So I'll never spin it up over 6,000 rpm. It runs on pump gas with 11:1 compression on Stealth aluminum heads and all I can say is I love it. It stupid fast, fun to drive and I have NO regrets!!  :burnout:


                                                                        Matt B.
Matt

Offline Cooter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1207
  • There goes the lone Challenger............
    • christinecarclub.com
Re: To stroke or not to stroke.....
« Reply #9 on: March 05, 2011 - 09:22:26 AM »
Stroke it...There's only one reason I can offer up and that is just when you are all done with it @ 440 cubes and this little voice WILL keep creeping up in your mind asking "What if"?, "I wonder what a stroker is all about"?, I wonder if That Mustang woulda gotten me if I had the stroker everybody told me to build?"


Don't bullsh*t yourself...Build once, and build it the baddest you can...
1958 plymouth Belvedere 2dr hd top "Christine" [OO)====V====(OO]
1969 dodge Charger "General Lee"         [___|______I______|___]                        
1968 Dodge Dart 2dr sedan 505" Stroker    (O]=0==========0=[O)                
1970 Challenger R/T Clone "Kowalski Special"   (OO) [___________] (OO)

Offline 72cudamaan

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3248
Re: To stroke or not to stroke.....
« Reply #10 on: March 05, 2011 - 09:55:29 AM »
I can hear your block now.   "stroke me,stroke me"  :cooldancing:
If I cant fix it, it's broke
 
Andy  (phukker whither)

Offline Katfish

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3733
  • 70 Challenger
Re: To stroke or not to stroke.....
« Reply #11 on: March 05, 2011 - 09:58:03 AM »
I can hear your block now.   "stroke me,stroke me"  :cooldancing:

I think that was Billy Squire?

Offline femtnmax

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 997
Re: To stroke or not to stroke.....
« Reply #12 on: March 05, 2011 - 10:35:12 AM »
I had a bone stock '68 GTX with 440 4 spd.  Could smoke and fry the tires anywhere.  At times the rear tires would rip hunks of asphalt off the pavement, or etch concrete.  Passing on the highway at 60 mph you had to be careful, punch it in 3rd gear and half the time the rear tires would break loose....ever pass a car while your accelerating from 60mph and going sideways at the same time??
Just how are you going to get all that stroker torque to the pavement without feathering the throttle?  Nobody can BS you on this one.
Phil

Offline lemming303

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1241
  • San Antonio, TX
Re: To stroke or not to stroke.....
« Reply #13 on: March 05, 2011 - 11:38:28 AM »
Yeah, femt is right. You gotta be able to put that power to the ground. But at the same time, I'm with Cooter. If you go with the 440 you will always think about how much more power you could've got with the stroker.
Kevin

73 Challenger Rallye - first project

Offline HemiOrange70

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2062
Re: To stroke or not to stroke.....
« Reply #14 on: March 05, 2011 - 12:46:06 PM »
Stroke it.