Were they expensive???

Author Topic: Were they expensive???  (Read 4229 times)

Offline hpe600rt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1995
  • how sweet it is
Re: Were they expensive???
« Reply #15 on: June 08, 2011 - 08:21:34 AM »
i wounder what the intrest was like back then,  i wouldnt say they the new ones are cheaper my house coust me 70k my car has about 100k into it.houses are going down big time and so is wadges cars are still pretty pricey,my cousien just bought his house for 58k his new truck coust 44k his house a few years ago would have been 120k how come the cars havent come down also and with the 415 a gallon that doesnt help eather i dont see how they keep selling them its cheaper to keep your old paid for car then to buy a new one,with just what you spen in intrest you can buy a pretty nice car.my guess in alot of people lease cars and dont owen them.




Offline hotrod98

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 825
    • Maniac Musclecars
Re: Were they expensive???
« Reply #16 on: June 08, 2011 - 11:57:47 AM »
Previously owned homes have come down in price. The cost to build a new one hasn't.
1971 Cuda, Tor-red, Bench seat
1971 Cuda Drag Car
1973 Cuda Clone, EFI/OD Limelight
1970 Superbird (Yes, it's real) Black Ice
1971 Barracuda Sassy Grass Green (sold)
1970 Challenger RT SE 383 Plum Crazy
1969 Road Runner Hardtop
1968 Road Runner Coupe (sold)

www.maniacmusclecars.com


Offline DAYTONA

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1760
Re: Were they expensive???
« Reply #17 on: June 08, 2011 - 10:58:14 PM »
...my first new car was a 1968 GTO convertible, I was 16 years old and making $1.35 per hour working in a grocery store...I ordered the car and needless to say, it was a very low optioned GTO, but I was 16 and didn't care...it ran good,  looked cool and the girls loved it

...the GTO stickered at $3650. or so and I paid $3400.





« Last Edit: June 08, 2011 - 11:00:13 PM by DAYTONA »

Offline Cuda Cody

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3988
  • Vancouver, WA
Re: Were they expensive???
« Reply #18 on: June 08, 2011 - 11:01:26 PM »
That photo ROCKS!  You the MAN!!!!!!!!   :2thumbs:
The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realize it doesn't say anything it's to late to stop reading it.

Offline challengermaniac

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 891
Re: Were they expensive???
« Reply #19 on: June 09, 2011 - 01:58:25 AM »
i wounder what the intrest was like back then,  i wouldnt say they the new ones are cheaper my house coust me 70k my car has about 100k into it.houses are going down big time and so is wadges cars are still pretty pricey,my cousien just bought his house for 58k his new truck coust 44k his house a few years ago would have been 120k how come the cars havent come down also and with the 415 a gallon that doesnt help eather i dont see how they keep selling them its cheaper to keep your old paid for car then to buy a new one,with just what you spen in intrest you can buy a pretty nice car.my guess in alot of people lease cars and dont owen them.

So true.  There are a lot of uninformed people out there just wanting to drive a new car and only concerned about the monthly payment.  They are financially uneducated.
Charlie
70 Challenger 340/4 Purple
70 Challenger T/A Red
Edmonds, WA

Offline HP2

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4478
Re: Were they expensive???
« Reply #20 on: June 09, 2011 - 10:33:17 AM »
It's tough to do a direct comparison of then to now because the overall economic picture now has some pretty extreme examples that you could pull from.

FWIW, the prime rate at the start of the 1960s was around 4-5%. It slowly rose to around 8-9% by 1970, so financing a car during the core of the muscle era was a more costly proposition. However, the first few years in the 1970s saw a rapid and brief rate decline back to 5% followed by a sharp and radical increase to 12% by 1975 and almost 20% by 1980.

I can recall my parents and many of their friends who had mortgages that were financed  in percentage rates of 15-18%. Combine that with the stagnant wages, increasing prices, and the loss in real buying power and you can see why so many people didn't opt for high end cars and even when the value of the muscle cars tanked, still couldn't afford to pick them up as investements. Not that many would have, really, by 1975-80 these were still just old cars that got lousy gas mileage.

Offline hpe600rt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1995
  • how sweet it is
Re: Were they expensive???
« Reply #21 on: June 09, 2011 - 03:10:00 PM »
it can go up to 40 percent intrest on loans now just depends on how bad your credit is,whitch alot of is bad the worse your score the moure you pay

Offline JH27N0B

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1324
Re: Were they expensive???
« Reply #22 on: June 09, 2011 - 07:00:02 PM »
One of things I hear people talking about concerning buying musclecars around the 1970 time period was how bad insurance rates were for big engines, and even getting a 4 speed could make getting insurance unaffordable.  Sometimes we'll see a car with a 3 speed stick and wonder why the original owner didn't spend a few more bucks to get the optional 4 speed, but even the differerence in insurance between a 3 speed and a 4 speed could be big.
I don't have the figures for how much the cost of living has gone up since the '70's, but I would guesstimate maybe 3X since the late 70's and 4X since the early '70's?  I got my first "real" job in late '78 at a grocery store bagging groceries part time for $3.65 an hour, I was happy to be getting a paycheck, but even though I was living for rent free at my parents, I wasn't swimming in money on the $70-$80 a week I was making.  I was able to save enough cash to buy a new Gibson Les Paul on sale for $575 a year after I started my job, what is a LP custom now, $3000?  And after getting promoted to stock boy making $6 an hour, when I was 18 I paid $6100 cash for a 2 year old Bronco, how much is a 2 year old SUV now, maybe $25K?  I remember premium was around $.75/gal when I first started driving, but gas had "spiked" up to $1.25 for regular when I bought the Bronco in '81, which is the main reason I got it for about 1/2 what it had costed new.

Offline HP2

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4478
Re: Were they expensive???
« Reply #23 on: June 10, 2011 - 10:57:49 AM »
  And after getting promoted to stock boy making $6 an hour, when I was 18 I paid $6100 cash for a 2 year old Bronco, how much is a 2 year old SUV now, maybe $25K? 


More like $38-45k.  I was at the chevy dealer the other day and a comparably equiped '11 Suburban compared to my '05, as just a tick over $50k. On the plus side, you could get a pretty decently equiped, but not an SS, Camaro for around $30k.

Offline hpe600rt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1995
  • how sweet it is
Re: Were they expensive???
« Reply #24 on: June 10, 2011 - 11:14:29 AM »
dont for get the intrist on the loan you can add anther 10k to that lol

Offline hpe600rt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1995
  • how sweet it is
Re: Were they expensive???
« Reply #25 on: June 15, 2011 - 09:10:32 AM »
i was thinking of this on the way home today,if you where makeing 3 dollers or so for min wadge back in the 70,80s and the car was at moust 4k now it is 7 someing min wadge, and the car is 40k or so the car should be 8k if it goes buy the min wadge so it is alot moure today.just a thought

Offline burnt orange

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 782
Re: Were they expensive???
« Reply #26 on: June 15, 2011 - 09:26:20 AM »
i was thinking of this on the way home today,if you where makeing 3 dollers or so for min wadge back in the 70,80s and the car was at moust 4k now it is 7 someing min wadge, and the car is 40k or so the car should be 8k if it goes buy the min wadge so it is alot moure today.just a thought

Minimum wage in early 70's was around $1.25/hr and the cars were closer to $5000 (here at least) so with our minimum wage now about $8.50/hr the new ones should be about $35000.  Not too far off!
< ° ) ) >< 

Offline hpe600rt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1995
  • how sweet it is
Re: Were they expensive???
« Reply #27 on: June 15, 2011 - 10:36:38 AM »
if that is what they where makeing back then it is about the same if you buy a low end car new

Offline HP2

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4478
Re: Were they expensive???
« Reply #28 on: June 15, 2011 - 02:41:31 PM »
Interesting graph on minimum wage here: http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/anth484/minwage.html

So according to this, the greatest real purchasing power was occuring between 1965 and 1970.

Offline hpe600rt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1995
  • how sweet it is
Re: Were they expensive???
« Reply #29 on: June 16, 2011 - 05:43:25 AM »
very cool to see that wow