Author Topic: STR-14 Intake manifold- I need an education  (Read 19958 times)

Offline Moparal

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 13085
Re: STR-14 Intake manifold- I need an education
« Reply #15 on: June 23, 2011 - 10:44:22 PM »
Alan, does it have a recommended power band in theMopar/DC book you have?


I'll look when I get home. I am in Alberta right now. got a few days left




Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: STR-14 Intake manifold- I need an education
« Reply #16 on: June 23, 2011 - 10:46:21 PM »

I'll look when I get home. I am in Alberta right now. got a few days left

Ah OK stay safe!
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: STR-14 Intake manifold- I need an education
« Reply #17 on: June 24, 2011 - 10:31:07 PM »
poor intake at best , I had one with a domiunator top , great power 4000-up to where ???
I pulled the top & I bet there was 1/2 lt of fuel in the intake goiung nowhere , switched to Team G & it worked better everywhere except maybe 7000 rpm up
I would leave it alone

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: STR-14 Intake manifold- I need an education
« Reply #18 on: June 24, 2011 - 10:39:05 PM »
poor intake at best , I had one with a domiunator top , great power 4000-up to where ???
I pulled the top & I bet there was 1/2 lt of fuel in the intake goiung nowhere , switched to Team G & it worked better everywhere except maybe 7000 rpm up
I would leave it alone

Ya that 2 that say the same thing( Jason)   Looks great but performance sucks.  :walkaway:
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline Challenger6pak

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4084
Re: STR-14 Intake manifold- I need an education
« Reply #19 on: June 25, 2011 - 02:12:37 PM »
Here is a vid of one in use.


1969 Sport Satellite H code convertible, 1970 Cuda 440+6, 1970 Challenger R/T 440+6, 1970 Challenger 383 R/T auto, 1970 Challenger R/T 383 4 speed,1971 Challenger convertible.

Offline ozrt4406

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 567
Re: STR-14 Intake manifold- I need an education
« Reply #20 on: June 26, 2011 - 12:38:26 AM »
i have done a lot  research on the str14, i have one also, they came in two styles, one str14/4 and str14/6 and then there was the str14/8,the str14/4 and /6 tops wont fit the st14/8,the bottom manifold is cast dfifferently, so , you cant put a crossram (2x4) top on a single 4or 6 pack manifold, also the dc mod books really only touch on the subject , not a lot of info there either
T/A AND R/T............... IM GREEDY.

Offline Challenger6pak

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4084
Re: STR-14 Intake manifold- I need an education
« Reply #21 on: June 26, 2011 - 09:09:17 AM »
All tops interchange on my manifold.  They do the same on my buddies manifold also. 
1969 Sport Satellite H code convertible, 1970 Cuda 440+6, 1970 Challenger R/T 440+6, 1970 Challenger 383 R/T auto, 1970 Challenger R/T 383 4 speed,1971 Challenger convertible.

Offline ozrt4406

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 567
Re: STR-14 Intake manifold- I need an education
« Reply #22 on: June 26, 2011 - 09:30:13 AM »
youre base must be a str14/8 i believe , as the str14/4 and /6 base didnt come as dual quad. youre a lucky man
T/A AND R/T............... IM GREEDY.

Offline black71

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 730
  • eph 6:12
Re: STR-14 Intake manifold- I need an education
« Reply #23 on: June 26, 2011 - 09:03:41 PM »
I too like everyone else love the looks of theses manifolds...but honestly prefer weiands version of the six pack. I know a big problem with these intakes (from what i've read) is the sheer volume inside the intake itself...kinda a stupid thought but what if you could mill/make a new top to cut some of that volume as well as get it to fit under a shaker hood. 

Offline Moparal

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 13085
Re: STR-14 Intake manifold- I need an education
« Reply #24 on: June 27, 2011 - 08:58:15 PM »
well im home now, so I will dig up the book for you Brad.

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: STR-14 Intake manifold- I need an education
« Reply #25 on: June 27, 2011 - 09:39:03 PM »
well im home now, so I will dig up the book for you Brad.

Thanks Al!  :wave:
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline Challenger6pak

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4084
Re: STR-14 Intake manifold- I need an education
« Reply #26 on: June 28, 2011 - 11:01:22 AM »
I finally got a few hours to pull this stuff out.  I tried to get the manifolds sitting at the same height as if they were both on an engine.  The STR is still sitting around 3/8 inches lower than the stock 6 pack manifold.  The STR is around a 2 inches taller than the stock manifold.

Third try on the pics.
« Last Edit: June 28, 2011 - 11:23:48 AM by Challenger6pak »
1969 Sport Satellite H code convertible, 1970 Cuda 440+6, 1970 Challenger R/T 440+6, 1970 Challenger 383 R/T auto, 1970 Challenger R/T 383 4 speed,1971 Challenger convertible.

Offline Challenger6pak

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4084
Re: STR-14 Intake manifold- I need an education
« Reply #27 on: June 28, 2011 - 11:09:05 AM »
I have two of these manifolds.  This is an unmodified bottom half.
1969 Sport Satellite H code convertible, 1970 Cuda 440+6, 1970 Challenger R/T 440+6, 1970 Challenger 383 R/T auto, 1970 Challenger R/T 383 4 speed,1971 Challenger convertible.

Offline Challenger6pak

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4084
Re: STR-14 Intake manifold- I need an education
« Reply #28 on: June 28, 2011 - 11:16:47 AM »
Here are the three tops that I have.  The 2-4 top does not have Edelbrock or Chrysler numbers on it. It looks as if it was sold as a blank top that you could do whatever you wanted with.  All tops have the same bolt pattern and will interchange.  These manifolds were sold with the intent that they would be modified or finished to suit the purpose that they would end up used for.  For instance if I were to finish this bottom for a 6 pack it will not work well with the 2-4's or a single 4.  I have some literature also.  After Al posts what he has I'll add to it if I have anything he does not have.
Tod
1969 Sport Satellite H code convertible, 1970 Cuda 440+6, 1970 Challenger R/T 440+6, 1970 Challenger 383 R/T auto, 1970 Challenger R/T 383 4 speed,1971 Challenger convertible.

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: STR-14 Intake manifold- I need an education
« Reply #29 on: June 28, 2011 - 12:25:38 PM »
Wow great pictures thanks! :2thumbs:  :clapping:

Looks like it's too tall  to work with my T/A style base. . Most likely would with a 6-pack style base as it doesn't seal to the hood?
Are you sure the base hasen't been modified, the pictures I've seen have a rib that your supposed to modify near the bottom of the intake port.
Wish it would work good on the street....sure looks cool!
Found these pictures about the mods?
http://www.forbbodiesonly.com/moparforum/showthread.php?t=11864
« Last Edit: June 28, 2011 - 12:32:28 PM by brads70 »
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0