Author Topic: Moog Ball joints  (Read 2243 times)

Offline dodj

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6197
Moog Ball joints
« on: October 24, 2011 - 12:54:15 PM »
I was looking at moog upper ball joints at Rock Auto and see they have 'regular' ball joints for the Challenger, and 'problem solver' ball joints. The problem solver ball joints are almost twice the price. My question is this, what problem are they trying to solve? I know of the offset UCA bushings, but what is the difference in the ball joint?  :clueless:
Scott
1973 Challenger  440 4 spd 
2007.5 3500 6.7 Cummins Diesel, Anarchy tuned.
Good friends don't let friends do stupid things. ........alone.




Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: Moog Ball joints
« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2011 - 03:30:17 PM »
  :dunno: :popcorn:
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline Topcat

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 15376
  • Member since 9/16/04
Mike, Fremont, CA.


Offline Strawdawg

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
    • Vortex Buicks
Re: Moog Ball joints
« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2011 - 10:07:14 PM »
It is their premium line of ball joints...advertised to eliminate the need to reduce the steering knuckle on certain cars and to last longer on others as I understand.

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: Moog Ball joints
« Reply #4 on: October 24, 2011 - 10:37:09 PM »
...advertised to eliminate the need to reduce the steering knuckle on certain cars

What the heck does that mean? :lol: :dunno:
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline Strawdawg

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
    • Vortex Buicks
Re: Moog Ball joints
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2011 - 12:15:19 AM »
Some cars came from the factory with ball joints designed to be replaced as part of an entire assembly rather than individually.  For some of these, Moog came up with a unit replacement that retains the old knuckle or control arm thus saving some money

Offline solarguy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 799
Re: Moog Ball joints
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2011 - 08:03:27 AM »
I think the problem solver upper ball joints are for when the threads on the control arm are damaged.  The problem solvers must be slightly oversize with an aggressive thread. 

Offline dodj

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6197
Re: Moog Ball joints
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2011 - 08:05:36 AM »
What is the p/n?
K7262N Problem solver $30.86

K772 Regular $15.12

Scott
1973 Challenger  440 4 spd 
2007.5 3500 6.7 Cummins Diesel, Anarchy tuned.
Good friends don't let friends do stupid things. ........alone.

Offline GoodysGotaCuda

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5392
Re: Moog Ball joints
« Reply #8 on: October 25, 2011 - 09:34:34 AM »
Check amazon for moog parts with the part number. I saved about $70 when I did that over the local parts store/rock auto about two years ago.  :2cents:

Free shipping, no tax!
Build Page: Goody's 'Cuda Build Page
1976 Dodge Warlock
1972 Barracuda - 5.7 Hemi + T56 Magnum

Wheel & Tire Specs:Link

Offline Strawdawg

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
    • Vortex Buicks
Re: Moog Ball joints
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2011 - 02:16:25 PM »
after some Googling, I have come to the conclusion that Moog has basically named its premium line Problem Saver.  Some are unique and made to fit certain Caddy or lincoln applications and others are just beefed up.

In general, Moog's replutation seems to have been hit over the past couple of years

Offline dodj

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6197
Re: Moog Ball joints
« Reply #10 on: October 25, 2011 - 03:38:03 PM »
In general, Moog's replutation seems to have been hit over the past couple of years
I was noticing that too. Is there a better alternative? Not sure.
Scott
1973 Challenger  440 4 spd 
2007.5 3500 6.7 Cummins Diesel, Anarchy tuned.
Good friends don't let friends do stupid things. ........alone.

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: Moog Ball joints
« Reply #11 on: October 25, 2011 - 04:04:38 PM »
I was noticing that too. Is there a better alternative? Not sure.


I used Howe upper ball joints in my c-body spindle/front end project. The difference in movement is night and day. It's like ball bearings compared to a friction movement. They are 2-3X the price though and only the uppers are available for our E-Bodies. They are rebuildable too!

http://www.howeracing.com/c-560-howe-precision-ball-joints.aspx
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline Strawdawg

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
    • Vortex Buicks
Re: Moog Ball joints
« Reply #12 on: October 25, 2011 - 09:47:39 PM »
Raybestos-Spicer are getting good marks and Mcquade Norris in its hd line seem to be well thought of