Author Topic: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?  (Read 10685 times)

Offline torqueaddict

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 310
Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
« on: October 26, 2011 - 02:25:26 AM »
What do you guys think is it that bad or just having an e body a blessing within itself?
1972 Challenger  (O O [======R/T=] O O) 1970 clone




Offline Katfish

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3733
  • 70 Challenger
Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2011 - 07:04:45 AM »
If it's not an 70 or 71, why bother?   :poopoke:

« Last Edit: October 26, 2011 - 08:23:37 PM by Katfish »

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2011 - 07:05:07 AM »
Nothing wrong with them of cource ! Some people prefer them! My first car ever was a 73 Challenger... lots of good memories with that car! :bigsmile:
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline Cooter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1207
  • There goes the lone Challenger............
    • christinecarclub.com
Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2011 - 07:42:04 AM »
IMo, '72-'74 E-bodies are largly disliked because of the Gov. mandated, 5MPH bumpers that stick out from the car. Once tucked back up next to the car, fillers removed, those "Plymouth Horizon"(Ever really looked at 'em, they look like the same exact piece) Side markers sticking out either recessed or removed in favor of the '70-'71 units. Once all the '72-'74 stuff is undone, they aren't bad...I have a 1976 Ford Maverick that I had to convert back to 1970 as well because of this...
1958 plymouth Belvedere 2dr hd top "Christine" [OO)====V====(OO]
1969 dodge Charger "General Lee"         [___|______I______|___]                        
1968 Dodge Dart 2dr sedan 505" Stroker    (O]=0==========0=[O)                
1970 Challenger R/T Clone "Kowalski Special"   (OO) [___________] (OO)

Offline coffecup9

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4
Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2011 - 08:14:18 AM »
As a proud owner of an 74 challenger. I am not into the whole car show matching numbers dog and pony show. for me it is seeing an E body, 70-74 that someone took the time to save from the crusher. put thier sweat and time and money in to to make it something special to them. :2cents:

Offline CUDA JAS

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2292
  • vroooooom!
Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
« Reply #5 on: October 26, 2011 - 09:52:59 AM »
My ol 74 turns a lot of heads. 

Makes me smile just as much too!

74 'cuda 360/727



Gearhead: car nut, automotive enthusiast, one who loves hot rods, muscle cars, hot trucks, burnin' rubber and neck snapping performance. 

Just call me a gearhead!

Offline Challenger6pak

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4084
Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2011 - 10:07:45 AM »
IMo, '72-'74 E-bodies are largly disliked because of the Gov. mandated, 5MPH bumpers that stick out from the car. Once tucked back up next to the car, fillers removed, those "Plymouth Horizon"(Ever really looked at 'em, they look like the same exact piece) Side markers sticking out either recessed or removed in favor of the '70-'71 units. Once all the '72-'74 stuff is undone, they aren't bad...I have a 1976 Ford Maverick that I had to convert back to 1970 as well because of this...
The 5 mph bumpers are 73 & 74.  The side markers were the same as Horizon.  They were also used on the front fenders of the truck and several other cars.  Chrysler was making one part fit all so they could keep their heads above water.  Those were the Iacoca years.  There is nothing wrong with the 72-74's.  The type of performance was changed in these cars.  The 74 was probably the best built Ebody.  They had reinforcements in the roofs and in a few other places.  The original intent of the muscle car is best displayed in the earlier years.  This is why the earlier years will always have the highest value and demand.
1969 Sport Satellite H code convertible, 1970 Cuda 440+6, 1970 Challenger R/T 440+6, 1970 Challenger 383 R/T auto, 1970 Challenger R/T 383 4 speed,1971 Challenger convertible.

Offline Challenger III

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1290
Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
« Reply #7 on: October 26, 2011 - 11:41:45 AM »
There was a stigma around the post '71's back in the day due to the emissions and horsepower drop.

The differences are all very blurry to me these days.  :2cents:
Mike    Yakima, Washington

Resto Thread:  http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=66668.0

Offline Grec

  • The '73 Chrysler should have made...
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 974
Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
« Reply #8 on: October 26, 2011 - 12:04:54 PM »
Is a 72+ E Body as desirable as the 70 or 71? No. (Although I will say that the front and rear ends on 71 Challengers aren't any more attractive IMHO) Are they still better looking cars than most anything else from the muscle car era? I think so. Do they still pull more attention than a Mustang, Chevelle, Camaro, etc? Definitely.

The simple fact is that E Bodies are few and far between no matter the year. I will see twenty 69 Camaros or late 60s Mustangs / Chevelles for every Challenger / Cuda that I see.

I can't go for a 6 pack of beer in my 73 without someone talking to me about my car. Chicks love it, too. Bonus! ;-)

I'm setting mine up as a "factory" 440 Six-Pack / 4-speed so the 72+ lack of power is a non issue for me. At that point, anybody who would look down on my car simply for being a 73 is being a snob and I don't care what they think. :-)

1973 Challenger Rallye
- 440 Six Pack
- A833 4 Speed, 18 Spline
- FE5 Rallye Red on Black

Offline 4Cruizn

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Expert
  • *****
  • Posts: 18521
  • HEMI FISH
Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
« Reply #9 on: October 26, 2011 - 12:10:24 PM »
I could care less what year the e-body is . . they are all cool as hell!   8)

Offline polarbear123

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 407
Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
« Reply #10 on: October 26, 2011 - 12:55:01 PM »
                         :iagree:

Offline dougs bs23

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1691
Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
« Reply #11 on: October 26, 2011 - 04:49:38 PM »
 :iagree:  with 4 and at least i can say i  own one :wavingflag: :wavingflag: :poopoke:
see Bill run  go Navy football///fly navy

Offline torredcuda

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 6218
  • Epping NH joined 11/23/03
Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
« Reply #12 on: October 26, 2011 - 06:28:41 PM »
Seems almost everyone wants a `70 or `71 Hemi e-body but any e-body attracts attention at any show/cruise or on the street.There are so few of them compared to all the Mustangs and Camaros and even b or a body Mopars, so ya even the `72-74s are cool.  :bigshades:
Jeff
72 Barracuda 340/4spd  Torred
70 roadrunner 383/auto  In-Violet
70 Duster 360/auto drag car  (Petty Blue soon)
04 Ram 2500 5.7 Hemi

Offline Matt70

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 868
Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
« Reply #13 on: October 26, 2011 - 06:33:29 PM »
I think they are all cool and would own any year. I have to say I'm partial to 70-71 Challengers and AAR and 71 Cudas.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

George Orwell

Offline willhaven

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1285
Re: Non 70 or 71 e bodies, is having one that bad?
« Reply #14 on: October 26, 2011 - 08:14:43 PM »
It's all about the look to me. I just prefer the look of the 71... but obviously I preferred some of the styling of the AAR too. hah

Some cars with the right combo can make a "bad" year look really good.