What year barracuda is this??

[bugsydog]

i cannot believe i dont know this, its a 67 or a 69?

[Jamiez]

1967 had no side markers
68 had circular/oval? ones
69 had rectangular.

So it should be a 67 but I suppose someone could have cloned a later year into a 67?

['Cuda Hunter]

With only that picture, I would say 67.

No corner lights.

68 has the round lights.  As most 67 mopars have.

69 has  a slightly different hood.

Got more pics?

[MEK-Dangerfield]

I would say a 67 too.

From where I sit, it looks to be in GREAT shape.     

[moparclown]

Thats a members car from the site FABO and yes its a 67 and a real sweet car.I love the way he tucked in the bumpers(I had contacted him about it and will be doing it to my 69)
also 67 and 69 had reverse lights located on the rear lower valance pan and 68's the reverse lights are in the tail light.

[bugsydog]

Did he explain to you how he tucks the bumpers in ?

[acudanut]

Looks like a "getto" barracuda to me.

[willhaven]

Wow that's awesome. The stance is perfect.

[Challenger6pak]

Looks like a "getto" barracuda to me.

I disagree.  The "ghetto" look doesn't tuck anything in.
 
The car looks great.

[bugsydog]

It looks GHETTO because its lowered? well i guess my cuda is GHETTO also.......

[WildJones]

The rims scream ghetto, but that is just me. Maybe its the combination of the rims with the super low stance. At any rate, its pretty ghetto.

[Jamiez]

I'm not a fan of the limo tint   I'd probably swap those and the rims if it was mine, but it's still really nice as is

[willhaven]

If they had made it into a raised DONK with Lamborghini doors and giant spinning rims... that would be ghetto.

[Challenger6pak]

 

[acudanut]

The rims scream ghetto, but that is just me. Maybe its the combination of the rims with the super low stance. At any rate, its pretty ghetto.

I am glad I am not the only one who screams "GETTO".