Author Topic: 1970 challenger v code r/t s/e  (Read 3789 times)

Offline Morris'_Mopars

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1173
1970 challenger v code r/t s/e
« on: May 01, 2012 - 08:40:42 AM »
I found a 70 Chally r/t s/e v code Dana drag car. It isn't a full tubbed drag car but could be converted to the street easy. No title or fender tag or broadcast sheet :(
Has no matching everything (racecar) and the body and top are in really good shape.
Any ideas on what the car is worth in today's market? Plus it's 9hrs away from me..
Thinking of selling my 70 Cuda if this deal comes together to have some $ to put into the Chally..
Morris' Mopars LLC
Raymond, Illinois
Mopar performance at affordable prices.




Offline hpe600rt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1995
  • how sweet it is
Re: 1970 challenger v code r/t s/e
« Reply #1 on: May 01, 2012 - 02:03:54 PM »
any pics :picture:

Offline ragtopdodge

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4065
Re: 1970 challenger v code r/t s/e
« Reply #2 on: May 01, 2012 - 02:47:22 PM »
Well...let's say it's fully restored with a date-coded engine.

Maybe $60k.  So...figure in restoration costs and initial purchase to make it worth it.
'70 318-auto Chally 'vert
'71 383-auto 'Cuda 'vert (sold)
06 300c SRT8
04 2500 QCLB 4x4 HO

Offline crocha617

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1700
Re: 1970 challenger v code r/t s/e
« Reply #3 on: May 02, 2012 - 07:07:31 PM »
Well...let's say it's fully restored with a date-coded engine.

Maybe $60k.  So...figure in restoration costs and initial purchase to make it worth it.

Without a Fender Tag, Build Sheet, or Matching numbers I don't think it will ever be worth any where near $60k again. If it was really nicely restored it may see closer to $40k but it will cost more to get it to that point. Unless it is really cheap and you have most of the parts I would find one with some documentation instead. I believe there is a project one on moparts right now with a fender tag and it's a real TX9 Black car as well. I think it is less then $20k which is still a little high in my opinion.

Offline Katfish

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3733
  • 70 Challenger
Re: 1970 challenger v code r/t s/e
« Reply #4 on: May 02, 2012 - 08:29:48 PM »
No title

No title?  Run Forest Run!

Offline Moparal

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 13085
Re: 1970 challenger v code r/t s/e
« Reply #5 on: May 02, 2012 - 09:03:42 PM »
No title?  Run Forest Run!


I live in a no title state :swaying:

Offline Morris'_Mopars

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1173
Re: 1970 challenger v code r/t s/e
« Reply #6 on: May 03, 2012 - 04:07:08 PM »
Decided to pass on the car at $22500.00...., :banghead:
Morris' Mopars LLC
Raymond, Illinois
Mopar performance at affordable prices.

Offline crocha617

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1700
Re: 1970 challenger v code r/t s/e
« Reply #7 on: May 04, 2012 - 06:41:27 PM »
Decided to pass on the car at $22500.00...., :banghead:

Very good Decision!!!   :2thumbs:

Offline Cuda Cody

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3988
  • Vancouver, WA
Re: 1970 challenger v code r/t s/e
« Reply #8 on: May 04, 2012 - 07:06:13 PM »
 :iagree: Oh Yes!
The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realize it doesn't say anything it's to late to stop reading it.

Offline hpe600rt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1995
  • how sweet it is
Re: 1970 challenger v code r/t s/e
« Reply #9 on: May 04, 2012 - 09:30:36 PM »
 :iagree: :wow:

Offline Gus cuda

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 482
Re: 1970 challenger v code r/t s/e
« Reply #10 on: May 07, 2012 - 10:02:10 PM »
Any convertible is not going to be cheap. Either pay on the front end or the back end. Good luck.

Offline Cuda Cody

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3988
  • Vancouver, WA
Re: 1970 challenger v code r/t s/e
« Reply #11 on: May 07, 2012 - 11:22:48 PM »
I don't think this was a convertible.

I know this goes against Mopar religion, but now that you brought it up I'm not a big fan of convertibles.   Just means more for everyone else!   :clapping:  Can really appreciate them, but I don't have a desire to own one.

Any convertible is not going to be cheap. Either pay on the front end or the back end. Good luck.
The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realize it doesn't say anything it's to late to stop reading it.

Offline crocha617

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1700
Re: 1970 challenger v code r/t s/e
« Reply #12 on: May 08, 2012 - 06:43:58 AM »
I don't think this was a convertible.

I know this goes against Mopar religion, but now that you brought it up I'm not a big fan of convertibles.   Just means more for everyone else!   :clapping:  Can really appreciate them, but I don't have a desire to own one.

A convertible would've gotten a much different reponse from me. We are not talking about a convertible as far as I know.

Offline Gus cuda

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 482
Re: 1970 challenger v code r/t s/e
« Reply #13 on: May 08, 2012 - 09:41:12 PM »
Yea my bad guys. Sorry I thought I saw convertible in the headline. With that said, yes I think you did the right thing by walkin away. Keep looking you will find one to suit you. Good luck!

Offline Automotive Engineer

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 32
Re: 1970 challenger v code r/t s/e
« Reply #14 on: May 15, 2012 - 12:37:47 PM »
I found a 70 Chally r/t s/e v code Dana drag car. It isn't a full tubbed drag car but could be converted to the street easy. No title or fender tag or broadcast sheet :(
Has no matching everything (racecar) and the body and top are in really good shape.
Any ideas on what the car is worth in today's market? Plus it's 9hrs away from me..
Thinking of selling my 70 Cuda if this deal comes together to have some $ to put into the Chally..



If it's this one, be careful to check the identity of the car.
There was NO VIN TAG or either Fender Tag, Build Sheet. The only statement for being a JS29V0 was this VIN sticker. 

CAN you trust it being a V code???


http://www.racingjunk.com/Stock-Super-Stock/2497895/1970-dodge-r-t-s-e-challenger-dragcar.html
« Last Edit: May 15, 2012 - 12:40:37 PM by Automotive Engineer »