Author Topic: Rev-a-Nator  (Read 7414 times)

Offline GranCuda1970

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5515
  • Rev 20:4. Mat 6:33 John 1:3 Mat 26:41
Rev-a-Nator
« on: August 23, 2012 - 10:43:11 AM »
Just read the article from Mopar Muscle (3,2,1 tech) magazine and I think i am going to purchase this unit. Great performance stats. looks easy to set-up looks close to a stock unit minus the ground cable set switch and RPM range lights.




Offline Super Blue 72

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 12711
  • "Big 'n Little" Member since 8/9/05
    • Phil's Super Blue '72
Re: Rev-a-Nator
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2012 - 08:12:43 PM »
Looks like a win-win situation.  Stock look, simple install, 10-40 extra hp, not bad...   :grinyes:
1972 Dodge Challenger Rallye 340, AT, Code TB3=Super Blue, SBD=8/17/1971.  Yes, a Rallye without the fender louvers from the factory because of the body side molding option.

Pic #2 and 3 of my ARII 1/24 scale model car 

Phil in New England-Massachusetts  Always thank God for what you have!

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/456046/1972-dodge-challenger

Offline GranCuda1970

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5515
  • Rev 20:4. Mat 6:33 John 1:3 Mat 26:41
Re: Rev-a-Nator
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2012 - 08:40:56 PM »
And a rev limiter so's I don't shoot a piston out the side of my block another win, win. :2thumbs:

Offline 74challenger03

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 820
Re: Rev-a-Nator
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2012 - 08:45:30 PM »
please post the article
What does it profit a man to gain the whole would and lose his soul.

Offline GranCuda1970

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5515
  • Rev 20:4. Mat 6:33 John 1:3 Mat 26:41
Re: Rev-a-Nator
« Reply #4 on: August 23, 2012 - 08:54:59 PM »
It is in this month's mopar muscle mag very awsome article, I tried to find it on thier website but could not locate it. I would take pictures of the mag but I don,t want to tick off the Publishers. Not the mopar muscle mag article but heres a link.

http://thertgarage.com/products.html

Offline GranCuda1970

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5515
  • Rev 20:4. Mat 6:33 John 1:3 Mat 26:41
Re: Rev-a-Nator
« Reply #5 on: August 23, 2012 - 09:00:38 PM »
I'm gonna get one as soon as I can pry the money from momma!!

Offline jvike

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 754
  • Pro-Touring Cuda
Re: Rev-a-Nator
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2012 - 02:15:17 AM »
I got one. Bolted it on last week, already had the timing at 32*. Car runs much smoother, the idle is bether. The timing is much more stable. I love it. Rev limiter is easy to use, and it runs alot cleaner up in the revs. Go get one!  :2thumbs:
Member of The Rapid Transit System

Offline jvike

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 754
  • Pro-Touring Cuda
Rev-a-Nator
« Reply #7 on: August 24, 2012 - 02:18:05 AM »
Picture
Member of The Rapid Transit System

Offline Super Blue 72

  • Permanent Resident
  • *******
  • Posts: 12711
  • "Big 'n Little" Member since 8/9/05
    • Phil's Super Blue '72
Re: Rev-a-Nator
« Reply #8 on: August 24, 2012 - 02:32:18 AM »
I got one. Bolted it on last week, already had the timing at 32*. Car runs much smoother, the idle is bether. The timing is much more stable. I love it. Rev limiter is easy to use, and it runs alot cleaner up in the revs. Go get one!  :2thumbs:

Thanks for the input!

Just curious, what were you running before the Rev a nator?  :clueless:
1972 Dodge Challenger Rallye 340, AT, Code TB3=Super Blue, SBD=8/17/1971.  Yes, a Rallye without the fender louvers from the factory because of the body side molding option.

Pic #2 and 3 of my ARII 1/24 scale model car 

Phil in New England-Massachusetts  Always thank God for what you have!

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/456046/1972-dodge-challenger

Offline wally426ci

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5095
    • maryland mopars
Re: Rev-a-Nator
« Reply #9 on: August 24, 2012 - 06:38:43 AM »
It was talked about over on Moparts and go the usual beating, but it did sound good.
{OOI====I====IOO}
      '71 Challenger
      [O[]=====[]O]
      '68 D100

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: Rev-a-Nator
« Reply #10 on: August 24, 2012 - 09:24:35 AM »
I must admit, I'm a Little skeptical of the hp claims?  :-\
Is this just a repackaged MSD type do dad?
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Rev-a-Nator
« Reply #11 on: August 24, 2012 - 10:19:35 AM »
no multiple spark to my knowledge but better electronics [what else is advancing as fast as electronics] stock looking but including a rev limiter , only 2 years too late for my Chall but I may have to get one yet .

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline GranCuda1970

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 5515
  • Rev 20:4. Mat 6:33 John 1:3 Mat 26:41
Re: Rev-a-Nator
« Reply #12 on: August 24, 2012 - 10:22:39 AM »
In the mopar muscle mag it shows the dyno gains they started with a orange box, then got better with a chrome box, then the revanator blew em both away. Good read.

Offline jvike

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 754
  • Pro-Touring Cuda
Rev-a-Nator
« Reply #13 on: August 24, 2012 - 07:13:05 PM »
Thanks for the input!

Just curious, what were you running before the Rev a nator?  :clueless:
Orange box.
Member of The Rapid Transit System

Offline Strawdawg

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
    • Vortex Buicks
Re: Rev-a-Nator
« Reply #14 on: August 24, 2012 - 11:13:04 PM »
it seems they suggest a ballast resistor for street use....hard for me to accept buying a modern ignition system that must have a ballast. 
The claims of more hp may be true when compared to a system that was not quite right.   It's hard to find an honest hp gain when comparing systems that are working right.

Looks like a nice system outside of the ballast requirement.  Looks like they could have found transistors that will handle the current like other modern systems.