Author Topic: Mild 440 street rebuild  (Read 14403 times)

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Mild 440 street rebuild
« Reply #15 on: September 20, 2013 - 02:37:02 PM »
Yes , I use the 2x the CI guideline for carbs so 950 minimum for 512 CI
 the SD or a larger single plane will work better with the larger CI the CH4b is very responsive and works well with less CI at lower RPM

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t




Offline challengerjeff

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 35
Re: Mild 440 street rebuild
« Reply #16 on: September 20, 2013 - 05:46:29 PM »
Thanks Chryco, now that I've got the basics I just need to save up some money!  :thumbsup:

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: Mild 440 street rebuild
« Reply #17 on: September 20, 2013 - 06:10:12 PM »
I do not have anything yet, I'm just planning the rebuild, so I can get whatever parts are recommended.  I'll need whatever is not included with the 440source stealth heads and any possible changes to what they include.

After looking at the Lunati catalog (the web site doesn't show nearly all the mopar items), I'm now leaning towards 20230712 hyd roller cam, which I think brads70 ended up using.  That way I won't have to worry about any flat tappet issues.  Would that cam work just as well?

I don't see a price on Johnson lifters web site, how does it compare to Lunati lifters?

Also, I've seen you guys mention the PRW rocker arms so I'm leaning that way.

Yep that's what I used.
I would buy the lifters elsewhere , I have had problems with Lunati

 :scared:  now ya tell me!  :lol: so far so good with mine? What kind of trouble did you have?
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline challengerjeff

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 35
Re: Mild 440 street rebuild
« Reply #18 on: September 20, 2013 - 08:26:05 PM »
brads70, other than engine size, I'd like to be similar to your build. :thumbsup:  I'd love to have an overdrive tranny and a nicely built Dana 60.  Anything you would have done different?

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: Mild 440 street rebuild
« Reply #19 on: September 20, 2013 - 09:13:21 PM »
brads70, other than engine size, I'd like to be similar to your build. :thumbsup:  I'd love to have an overdrive tranny and a nicely built Dana 60.  Anything you would have done different?

I would have went with 3:73 gears instead of 3:55. Oh ya..... don't use a gear drive , too noisy!  :eek4:
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Mild 440 street rebuild
« Reply #20 on: September 21, 2013 - 12:25:28 AM »
the groove in the lifter for oiling was too low so with the lifter all the way down in the closed valve position it bled off oil pressure wiping the main brgs

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: Mild 440 street rebuild
« Reply #21 on: September 21, 2013 - 08:42:19 AM »
the groove in the lifter for oiling was too low so with the lifter all the way down in the closed valve position it bled off oil pressure wiping the main brgs

Ouch!
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline challengerjeff

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 35
Re: Mild 440 street rebuild
« Reply #22 on: September 21, 2013 - 08:51:39 PM »
the groove in the lifter for oiling was too low so with the lifter all the way down in the closed valve position it bled off oil pressure wiping the main brgs

Hopefully you don't experience any issues with the lunati lifters but I'll go with Johnson's.


I would have went with 3:73 gears instead of 3:55. Oh ya..... don't use a gear drive , too noisy!  :eek4:

I agree about the gear ratio, I was thinking 3.73 because anything higher might be overkill for my use.  It might be fun to have 4.10 though  :biggrin:

I'm not familiar with gear drives, I know what they are just not the pros and cons.  What made you choose it for your build?

Offline brads70

  • C-C.com Expert
  • ********
  • Posts: 18747
Re: Mild 440 street rebuild
« Reply #23 on: September 21, 2013 - 10:02:14 PM »
I'm not familiar with gear drives, I know what they are just not the pros and cons.  What made you choose it for your build?

They are supposed to be very reliable. Won't break?
Brad
1970 Challenger 451stroker/4L60 auto OD
Barrie,Ontario,Canada
Proud to own one of the best cars ever made!!!!!

My restoration thread 
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=59072.0
 My handling upgrade post
http://www.cuda-challenger.com/cc/index.php?topic=73985.0

Offline The Cuda Guy

  • Support Our Troops
  • Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 3899
  • Pearl Harbor, HI
    • C-C.com
Re: Mild 440 street rebuild
« Reply #24 on: September 22, 2013 - 02:14:49 AM »
If we are talking using the same cam from a 440 or a 470 ci then wont you be leaving a lot of performance on the table if you dont match it to your exact application 505/512 ci?  There are many factors in selecting a cam.

Don
The Cuda Guy Project is on going!

Member Since January 14, 2002

Offline challengerjeff

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 35
Re: Mild 440 street rebuild
« Reply #25 on: September 22, 2013 - 11:35:04 AM »
If we are talking using the same cam from a 440 or a 470 ci then wont you be leaving a lot of performance on the table if you dont match it to your exact application 505/512 ci?  There are many factors in selecting a cam.

Don

Chryco will have to weigh in but I was more concerned about keeping it streetable?

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Mild 440 street rebuild
« Reply #26 on: September 22, 2013 - 12:19:12 PM »
the same as putting the same cam in a small block or big block the stroker can use more cam & remain streetable , the extra 60-70 CI will lower the rpm of any cam . EFI is even more crazy , using a race cam the engine will still sound dead stock

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline challengerjeff

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 35
Re: Mild 440 street rebuild
« Reply #27 on: September 22, 2013 - 08:12:51 PM »
I was hoping to stick with a hydraulic roller cam.  Lunati lists only one more aggressive hyd roller cam, 20230713, unless they do custom grinds.  The advertised duration is 292/302, lift is .560/.565 w/ 1.5 RR.  Would this cam be better for me?
« Last Edit: September 22, 2013 - 08:18:23 PM by challengerjeff »

Offline The Cuda Guy

  • Support Our Troops
  • Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 3899
  • Pearl Harbor, HI
    • C-C.com
Re: Mild 440 street rebuild
« Reply #28 on: September 23, 2013 - 03:42:06 AM »
Chryco will have to weigh in but I was more concerned about keeping it streetable?

For the record, I already knew the answer to this question.  But I wanted to get it out there.  You should talk to someone who knows cams for your CI and application/goals ect.  and get a recommendation.

Don
The Cuda Guy Project is on going!

Member Since January 14, 2002

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Mild 440 street rebuild
« Reply #29 on: September 23, 2013 - 08:51:37 AM »
Depending on what you are using the engine for a 300 * advertised duration would seem to be too much for what you are doing

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t