Author Topic: 383 carb question  (Read 803 times)

Offline tunerwannab

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 9
383 carb question
« on: September 22, 2013 - 12:45:54 AM »
I looking at changing the carb on my 71 challenger. It has a 383. Don't know exact motor details, previous owner told me he did the biggest cam he could without messing with valves, it does have a mopar performance intake manifold and headers.

Currently I have a Holley 600 I think, no choke, I forget the exact model but it is not a common or popular one. I'm undecided between an edlebrock 600 or 650 with electric choke. Currently the car will cruise fine but when cruising if I give it more gas it chokes for a second then goes. Any tips advice would be awesome. I trying to do this Tuesday.




Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
« Last Edit: September 22, 2013 - 03:31:57 AM by cudabob496 »
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: 383 carb question
« Reply #2 on: September 22, 2013 - 08:45:50 AM »
I would be looking at a 750 Proform carb

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline tunerwannab

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 9
Re: 383 carb question
« Reply #3 on: September 22, 2013 - 11:09:03 AM »
Looking at that chart I wouldn't think my car runs at 100% efficiency. Is it better to have a too much carb than to little.

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: 383 carb question
« Reply #4 on: September 22, 2013 - 12:09:44 PM »
How many times have we had this discussion ! The best formula for picking a carb is 2x the CI so 383 is 766 .
 True you cannot change physics but maybe the carbs do not flow as much air as advertised but real world experience is approx. 2x the CI works well .
Proform has one of the most affordable & tunable carbs on the market with vacuum or mech secondary .
The reality is the Holley you have can be tuned to work well also , check float levels , change the squirter or pump cams , replace the secondary spring or use the correct power valve & the hesitation will disappear .

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline 72cudamaan

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3248
Re: 383 carb question
« Reply #5 on: September 22, 2013 - 01:46:50 PM »
How many times have we had this discussion ! The best formula for picking a carb is 2x the CI so 383 is 766 .
 True you cannot change physics but maybe the carbs do not flow as much air as advertised works well .


Neil, say it ain't so.  :roflsmiley:   Manufacturers advertising falsely. That couldn't happen.   :wow:   I agree with the 2x
formula as well.
If I cant fix it, it's broke
 
Andy  (phukker whither)

Offline jhaag

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 616
Re: 383 carb question
« Reply #6 on: September 22, 2013 - 10:37:04 PM »
I agree with chryco. try to fix what you have unless you need the choke. as to your question on whether to error on the small or larger cfm size, on a street car you will get better throttle response and driveability with a slightly undersized carb over 1 that is too big. if your carb has the choke horn still on it, it will have a number stamped on it, go to holleys' web site and you can figure out exactly what you have, then work from that
love 70 Challengers

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: 383 carb question
« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2013 - 12:15:37 AM »
I agree with chryco. try to fix what you have unless you need the choke. as to your question on whether to error on the small or larger cfm size, on a street car you will get better throttle response and driveability with a slightly undersized carb over 1 that is too big. if your carb has the choke horn still on it, it will have a number stamped on it, go to holleys' web site and you can figure out exactly what you have, then work from that

I agree, a well dialed-in 750 supported my old built 440 to well over 500 hp.
If he didn't take his challenger above 5500 rpm, then a 650 would probably make him
quicker on the street.  A 750 on his 383 would be necessary if he was taking it
up to 6000+ rpm.

Though a much different engine, the 850 hp NASCAR car engines use an 830 cfm carb. They are probably
as close to a volumetric effeciency of 1.0 you are gonna get. I think you go above 1.0 when you have
a blown or turbo engine.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2013 - 10:59:43 PM by cudabob496 »
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000