Hey Brad
Did you have to raise the rear end to get the QA1 shocks in? I'm trying to decide Bilstien vs QA1 and want to get your take on the adjustability of the QA1.
Thanks,
Bryan
No I didn't need to raise the rear end to install them? Never heard of a shock raising the car before unless it's a coil over or air shock. In my case I had to take some measurements at static ride height and fully extended to get the correct part #'s as mine car is lower than stock and might have bottomed out with the stock catalogue part #'s .
I needed the adjustable feature for a couple of reasons, one with the Composite rear leaf springs the RCD Bilsteins didn't cut it. The rear end bounced around some. Composite springs react much quicker than steel in addition to being MUCH lighter. Second is I want to try out autocrossing my car. Adjustable shocks work well for this as you can dial in a comfy ride when on the streets then aggressive when your on the track. Member Jamiez has then also ( for a second opinion) For an everyday street cruiser I'm not sure you would see the benefit for the money spent?
The RCD shocks were great until I went with the composite leaf springs..... as the old saying goes, " going fast costs money! How fast do you want to go?"
Hotchkiss just came out with Fox shocks revalved to Hotchkiss specs. non-adjustable and single adjustable versions. Might be a cheaper option too? Personally I'm not into the "shock of the month club" thing that's going on now. For a bone stock cruiser sure it might be great but I don't buy the " one shock fits all" thing that's advertised from a few of the suppliers. How does one shock cover different weights SB vs BB , different torsion bar diameters, heights,tires, brakes and driving style, never mind people that wander away from the stock set ups..... not that I'm any sort of an "expert" just my