« Reply #17 on: November 25, 2013 - 02:07:10 PM »
Think it through. If you connect a vacuum hose to your valve cover, you need a pcv valve in the system in case of an engine backfire. You don't want to blow the pan off. If you are sucking oil out of your valve covers you need to put a baffle under it or move it to a different location. You should have only a very slight mist entering your intake which is in turn sucked back into the engine and burned, creating no ill affects. All you need is a breather on 1 side and pcv connected to the carb base, on the other. This creates some negative pressure and source for clean air. Negative pressure helps horsepower, ring seal. blowby, etc. If you have ever looked at pro stock drag racing engine technology, you will see they actually use vacuum pumps to create negative crankcase pressure. So the answer to the original question is yes a properly designed and connected pcv system, while not absolutely necessary is far better than 3 or 4 breathers open to the atmosphere.
I considered a vacuum pump, but was told you have to have special rings for it to be effective.
Not sure how a back fire could blow pan off, if valve covers vented. Will have to think about that one.
Logged
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.
1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"
2011 Kawasaki Z1000