Author Topic: Low Compression  (Read 6733 times)

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: Low Compression
« Reply #45 on: May 04, 2014 - 06:55:47 AM »
lean on one side of engine due to intake manifold leak?
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000




Offline cwestra

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1120
Re: Low Compression
« Reply #46 on: May 04, 2014 - 08:40:10 AM »
Well at least you have found the problem , too lean , probably , excessive heat one the exhaust valves , weird on the exhaust manifold though , most dual plane intakes feed both center ports from the same side of the carb , what intake are you using ?
Stock aluminum 6 barrel.
Corey - in Northern Indiana

Offline 72cudamaan

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3248
Re: Low Compression
« Reply #47 on: May 04, 2014 - 08:43:22 AM »
That valve isn't burnt. Looks like aluminum deposit between valve and seat. Guess you'll find out when the valve
gets pulled. The light tan condition is quite common with today's fuel and the additives in it. Though it does appear
that you were running a bit lean.
If I cant fix it, it's broke
 
Andy  (phukker whither)

Offline cwestra

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1120
Re: Low Compression
« Reply #48 on: May 06, 2014 - 07:55:01 AM »
That valve isn't burnt. Looks like aluminum deposit between valve and seat. Guess you'll find out when the valve
gets pulled. The light tan condition is quite common with today's fuel and the additives in it. Though it does appear
that you were running a bit lean.
You are correct.  It was not burned.  No signs of debris holding it open, though, but the valve was fairly loose in the guide.  The machine shop believes that the worn guide may have caused mis-alignment with the seat resulting in the leak.  They are going to install a new bronze guide and see if they can clean up the valve and hardened seat to get it to seal.  Should be an easy fix.
Corey - in Northern Indiana

Offline 72cudamaan

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3248
Re: Low Compression
« Reply #49 on: May 06, 2014 - 09:16:48 AM »
  :thumbsup:  Good to hear. I assume they are going through the whole head(s)? I've seen one bad guide before, but it is rare.
I wonder if that deposit in the exhaust port might have been created by the constant rush of burnt gasses running through it.
As opposed to only when they were supposed to?
If I cant fix it, it's broke
 
Andy  (phukker whither)

Offline Strawdawg

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
    • Vortex Buicks
Re: Low Compression
« Reply #50 on: May 06, 2014 - 09:20:48 AM »
  :thumbsup:  Good to hear. I assume they are going through the whole head(s)? I've seen one bad guide before, but it is rare.
I wonder if that deposit in the exhaust port might have been created by the constant rush of burnt gasses running through it.
As opposed to only when they were supposed to?

Would seem reasonable as it would be burning on the way thru rather than retained longer in the cylinder for a more complete burn and a leaner exhaust stream......



Most definitely want to go thru all the valves...I would say both sides to avoid another problem a few thousand down the road

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Low Compression
« Reply #51 on: May 06, 2014 - 08:48:59 PM »
I agree , heat of the exhaust especially if it is on the lean side , hard seats should prevent the valve welding to the seat as it cool when it closes but cheap seats or valve could be welding themselves , so erosion of the valves could be causing the gap

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline jimynick

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 4512
Re: Low Compression
« Reply #52 on: May 06, 2014 - 10:59:59 PM »
If my feeble mind is reading those A/F charts right, that thing is way too lean. In days of old the magic # was 14.2:1 for  a stoichiometric ratio and now they talk 14.7 at cruise. However, the generally accepted best ratio for power making is in the mid to low 12's and your #'s show you nearing 16! Look closely at the pistons, because they're the only source of aluminum that close to the valve and it's possible the engine may have detonated while lean and knocked some off one. There's no reason you couldn't touch up that valve once the guide works been done and the shop will check it for concentricity when they grind it. Good luck!  :cheers:

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: Low Compression
« Reply #53 on: May 07, 2014 - 12:44:49 AM »
If my feeble mind is reading those A/F charts right, that thing is way too lean. In days of old the magic # was 14.2:1 for  a stoichiometric ratio and now they talk 14.7 at cruise. However, the generally accepted best ratio for power making is in the mid to low 12's and your #'s show you nearing 16! Look closely at the pistons, because they're the only source of aluminum that close to the valve and it's possible the engine may have detonated while lean and knocked some off one. There's no reason you couldn't touch up that valve once the guide works been done and the shop will check it for concentricity when they grind it. Good luck!  :cheers:

I'm running about 13 to 13.5 when cruising, and around 12.5 when full throttle.
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline cwestra

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1120
Re: Low Compression
« Reply #54 on: May 12, 2014 - 08:35:34 PM »
Engine back together.  All other valves on that head were fine.  May have been an overlooked guide during rebuild 5 years ago.  Anyway, compression back up to 140 psi on #8 with 91% efficiency in leak test.  Glad to have it back on the road.  Thanks for all the assistance from you guys.
Corey - in Northern Indiana

Offline Strawdawg

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
    • Vortex Buicks
Re: Low Compression
« Reply #55 on: May 12, 2014 - 08:37:34 PM »
Glad it turned out so well!

Steve


Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: Low Compression
« Reply #56 on: May 13, 2014 - 12:19:25 AM »
 :2thumbs:

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline cwestra

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1120
Re: Low Compression
« Reply #57 on: May 13, 2014 - 08:48:57 PM »
If my feeble mind is reading those A/F charts right, that thing is way too lean. In days of old the magic # was 14.2:1 for  a stoichiometric ratio and now they talk 14.7 at cruise. However, the generally accepted best ratio for power making is in the mid to low 12's and your #'s show you nearing 16! Look closely at the pistons, because they're the only source of aluminum that close to the valve and it's possible the engine may have detonated while lean and knocked some off one. There's no reason you couldn't touch up that valve once the guide works been done and the shop will check it for concentricity when they grind it. Good luck!  :cheers:
Yes, at a cruise it seems lean but wasn't sure if that was normal or not.  I did notice when I pulled the intake manifold that it seemed a bit oily in areas where I expected it to be dry, indicating that I may have had a leak.  I've included a picture to show it.  That would tend to create a leaner condition, I believe.  I do plan on hooking up the AFR meter again this year and I'll see if I get similar readings with the new gaskets in place.  I also may try bumping the jets up a bit if I am still running lean.
Corey - in Northern Indiana