Author Topic: 73, 340 compression question  (Read 6785 times)

Offline crash340

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1291
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #15 on: May 03, 2014 - 08:09:45 PM »
 :popcorn:
Greg

73 Cuda
Brisbane, Australia




Offline mrbill426

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 775
    • All Around Mopars
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #16 on: May 03, 2014 - 08:12:53 PM »
So there are no maximum "yes it will fit" aftermarket cams for say a '68 340?  I understand the (should check it) aspect, just wondered about tried and true.

Thanks



Generally I think you need at least .1 inches clearance piston to valve clearance. That's what I was told when changing cams on my 440. But taking some measurements initially is the right thing to do.
st
MOPAR or NO car!

'72 'Cuda 340, white on white
'72 Sebring; bracket project
'64 Imperial Crown black on black
'66 Imperial Crown; parts car

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #17 on: May 03, 2014 - 08:59:52 PM »
So there are no maximum "yes it will fit" aftermarket cams for say a '68 340?  I understand the (should check it) aspect, just wondered about tried and true.

Thanks


 st

I'm sure there are guys on this site that know what worked for them. But I would also call the cam manufacturer, tell him what you got, and he should probably
know if it will fit.  that way, if you buy it, and there's problems, at least you have some recourse.
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #18 on: May 03, 2014 - 09:21:58 PM »
the taller pistons have valve reliefs so .500 lift is fine , you actually often have more clearance than you would with lower comp pistons because of the reliefs

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline dpcd67

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 278
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #19 on: May 05, 2014 - 05:52:15 PM »
I used a Comp 268H cam and there are no valve to piston relief issues; the pistons have big notches in them for valve clearance.  Sealed power pistons.
1963 Dodge M37 (3)
1967 Dodge WM300 (2)
1971 Plymouth Duster
Bought new in '71; I wanted the Challenger but they were $2850; too much $ so I got the 318, 3 speed on the floor, Twister Duster for $2100.
1973 Plymouth Barracuda
I ain't done yet.

Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #20 on: May 05, 2014 - 09:55:58 PM »
I assume at assembly, there is a way to verify no contact, before actually starting engine?
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline mrbill426

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 775
    • All Around Mopars
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #21 on: May 05, 2014 - 11:59:17 PM »
Some folks put a thin layer of (I think oiled) modeling clay on top of the piston and rotate the engine through both cycles with the head on, them pull the head and note the valve impressions in the clay.


I assume at assembly, there is a way to verify no contact, before actually starting engine?
MOPAR or NO car!

'72 'Cuda 340, white on white
'72 Sebring; bracket project
'64 Imperial Crown black on black
'66 Imperial Crown; parts car

Offline Strawdawg

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
    • Vortex Buicks
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #22 on: May 06, 2014 - 12:29:03 AM »
Some folks put a thin layer of (I think oiled) modeling clay on top of the piston and rotate the engine through both cycles with the head on, them pull the head and note the valve impressions in the clay.


As you said--You put the clay over the valve reliefs and then smear a coat of oil on it to prevent from sticking to the valve(s) when you rotate the the engine as you describe.  You put the gasket on the block and then set the head on...just lightly snug the head bolts-not enuf to compress the gasket.  Most manufacturers provide the uncompressed and compressed gasket thicknesses so you can add the difference to amount of the cut in the clay...that way you don't ruin a head gasket.

Normally clearance is only a concern when using high lift cams as Neil pointed out.  Most pop up pistons are cut with deep reliefs from the factory


Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #23 on: May 06, 2014 - 01:13:53 AM »
If keep heads on, then need to verify there are valve reliefs in the pistons.
Maybe a boroscope through a spark plug hole.
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline Strawdawg

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
    • Vortex Buicks
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #24 on: May 06, 2014 - 09:18:48 AM »
So there are no maximum "yes it will fit" aftermarket cams for say a '68 340?  I understand the (should check it) aspect, just wondered about tried and true.

Thanks





If you are starting with a low compression engine and not rebuilding it for higher compression, then you will want to keep the cam matched to the existing compression which means a relatively mild cam and no worries about valve interference.  Given that the factory pistons are down in the block, by the time you got enuf lift to create potential problems, the car would probably not run anyway :)

If you have any doubts about the current compression ratio, simply do a compression test on a few cylinders.  If it is above 200 psi, you might have a problem.  If it is more like 140, you will not as long as you stick with the cam companies recommendation for your advertised compression ratio.

Offline 72cudamaan

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 3248
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #25 on: May 06, 2014 - 09:24:29 AM »
If keep heads on, then need to verify there are valve reliefs in the pistons.
Maybe a boroscope through a spark plug hole.

Good thought, but you still need a way to verify how deep the reliefs are ie: valve to piston clearance. Usually the minimum recommended
is .060" on the intake and .100 on the exhaust. If heads were on then you would have to get each piston on TDC, remove
the valve springs, and put a dial indicator on the stem tip. Lower the valve until it touches. Measure the total travel
of the valve and subtract your minimum clearance from the total. Personally, I would pull the heads and measure with the clay.
If I cant fix it, it's broke
 
Andy  (phukker whither)

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #26 on: May 06, 2014 - 09:46:20 PM »
Valve clearance is a dynamic changing all the time , the piston is chasing the exhaust valve upward , total lift means nothing , it is a variable between lift & duration , the longer the duration the later the exhaust valve closes as the piston is rising towards it or earlier the intake will open as the piston is moving away so even if you roll the engine over with the current cam knowing the lift you may have plenty of clearance but a similar lift cam with longer duration may be tight for clearance , the Only way  to know for sure is install the cam & turn it over using putty , , the closest point may be roughly 6* before TDC between the piston & exhaust valve or 6-10* after TDC as the intake is opening as it chases the piston down the bore . If you change the installed centerline of cam by degreeing it in advanced or retarded  the clearance may go away also . The overlap in the cam is created by closing the exhaust valve late & opening the intake early , the exhaust & intake valves are actually open over TDC allowing the exiting exhaust to create a vacuum & pulling in the intake charge , it is actually more effective at filling the cylinder than the piston moving down the bore with a longer duration cam @ higher rpm 

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline mrbill426

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 775
    • All Around Mopars
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #27 on: May 06, 2014 - 10:34:39 PM »
What I plan to install are a set of +.020" Speed Pro forged pistons which do have valve reliefs; I think they are #2316F-20.  The heads are stock '72 with the smaller exhaust valves though.  This is a April '72 engine that has a steel crank.  I have a LD340 intake that I was thinking of using but I'm told it might not accept the factory A/C compressor which I AM retaining.  Stock exhaust will be retained too.

 :working: 



If you are starting with a low compression engine and not rebuilding it for higher compression, then you will want to keep the cam matched to the existing compression which means a relatively mild cam and no worries about valve interference.  Given that the factory pistons are down in the block, by the time you got enuf lift to create potential problems, the car would probably not run anyway :)

If you have any doubts about the current compression ratio, simply do a compression test on a few cylinders.  If it is above 200 psi, you might have a problem.  If it is more like 140, you will not as long as you stick with the cam companies recommendation for your advertised compression ratio.
« Last Edit: May 07, 2014 - 10:05:51 AM by mrbill426 »
MOPAR or NO car!

'72 'Cuda 340, white on white
'72 Sebring; bracket project
'64 Imperial Crown black on black
'66 Imperial Crown; parts car

Offline Tonker1

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 365
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #28 on: May 08, 2014 - 10:12:42 PM »
:popcorn:

Offline mrbill426

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 775
    • All Around Mopars
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #29 on: May 08, 2014 - 11:14:45 PM »
MOPAR or NO car!

'72 'Cuda 340, white on white
'72 Sebring; bracket project
'64 Imperial Crown black on black
'66 Imperial Crown; parts car