Author Topic: 73, 340 compression question  (Read 6772 times)

Offline Strawdawg

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
    • Vortex Buicks
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #30 on: May 08, 2014 - 11:15:55 PM »
What are you asking? :)

Steve





Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #31 on: May 08, 2014 - 11:20:19 PM »
Generally you are safe to around .525 lift with pistons with valve reliefs , you will probably have to trim the valve guides a little or at least change to apositive seal to stop the retainer crushing the seal or hitting the top of the guides . if you stay around .500 lift with 230 -240* duration @ .050 you should be fine , But I would still check it . I have used .590 lift cams with 250* duration with notched piston in the past with steel shim gaskets in 440s

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline mrbill426

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 775
    • All Around Mopars
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #32 on: May 08, 2014 - 11:28:40 PM »
Oh I would not be going that high  at all Chryco, I am still using stock exhaust manifolds.  Thanks for that info though  :thumbsup:


Strawdawg, it was more of a comment, no question  mark, my fault  :)
Will a LD340 work (fit) with factory A/C?  And, also will that intake work with the stock air cleaner, and still be able to close the hood w/hood blanket?

 :working:




Generally you are safe to around .525 lift with pistons with valve reliefs , you will probably have to trim the valve guides a little or at least change to apositive seal to stop the retainer crushing the seal or hitting the top of the guides . if you stay around .500 lift with 230 -240* duration @ .050 you should be fine , But I would still check it . I have used .590 lift cams with 250* duration with notched piston in the past with steel shim gaskets in 440s
MOPAR or NO car!

'72 'Cuda 340, white on white
'72 Sebring; bracket project
'64 Imperial Crown black on black
'66 Imperial Crown; parts car

Offline Strawdawg

  • Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
    • Vortex Buicks
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #33 on: May 08, 2014 - 11:38:48 PM »
Those, I don't know. :D.   I am guessing some where around 220-224 @. 050 would be a good cam choice for what you are proposing and no concern about clearance as Chryco said

Steve


Offline cudabob496

  • Sr. Resident
  • ******
  • Posts: 8024
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #34 on: May 08, 2014 - 11:46:04 PM »
Good thought, but you still need a way to verify how deep the reliefs are ie: valve to piston clearance. Usually the minimum recommended
is .060" on the intake and .100 on the exhaust. If heads were on then you would have to get each piston on TDC, remove
the valve springs, and put a dial indicator on the stem tip. Lower the valve until it touches. Measure the total travel
of the valve and subtract your minimum clearance from the total. Personally, I would pull the heads and measure with the clay.

Perhaps, but Chryco had suggested that if reliefs are there, should be ok for this situation, and no need to measure depth.
Many times we'll buy an engine, having been told whats inside, and it turns out not to be the case.
72 Cuda, owned 25 years. 496, with ported Stage VI heads, .625 in solid roller, 254/258 at .050, 3500 stall, 3.91 rear. 850 Holley DP, Reverse manual valve body.

1999 Trans Am, LS1, heads, cam, headers, stall, etc! Love to surprise the rice rockets with this one. They seem so confident, then it's "what the heck just happened?"

2011 Kawasaki Z1000

Offline Chryco Psycho

  • Administrator
  • C-C.com Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 36620
  • 70 Challenger R/T SE 70 tube Chassis Cuda now sold
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #35 on: May 09, 2014 - 12:17:29 AM »
Well the cams I typically use are aggressive , Lunati has the VooDoo which have short duration but high lift , so a relatively mild cam around 230* @ .050 can still lift close to .500 , my theory is lift is free get all you can with a ny duration .
 I am in no way suggesting you will be OK , you Should be OK but I would still check , a valve relief doesn't guarantee enough clearance , different piston mfgs could use a different spec for the diameter or depth , even swapping heads can cause issues , when we swapped eddy RPM heads onto a 440 the valves were located slightly differently in the heads so the valve missed the relifs & hit the pistons so the pistons had to be fly cut 

Challenger - You`ll wish You Hadn`t

Offline mrbill426

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 775
    • All Around Mopars
Re: 73, 340 compression question
« Reply #36 on: May 09, 2014 - 08:57:37 AM »
Okay I will look around for a cam with a profile like that.  Using stock exhaust I obviously have limitations but I do want something with a bit more low end get movin than stock.  Right now it has 3:23 gears but it's getting 3:55s.  And yes, I WILL check valve clearance  :)

Still have to figure the LD-340 "fit" with A/C and original air cleaner.

Thanks!

Well the cams I typically use are aggressive , Lunati has the VooDoo which have short duration but high lift , so a relatively mild cam around 230* @ .050 can still lift close to .500 , my theory is lift is free get all you can with a ny duration .
 I am in no way suggesting you will be OK , you Should be OK but I would still check , a valve relief doesn't guarantee enough clearance , different piston mfgs could use a different spec for the diameter or depth , even swapping heads can cause issues , when we swapped eddy RPM heads onto a 440 the valves were located slightly differently in the heads so the valve missed the relifs & hit the pistons so the pistons had to be fly cut
MOPAR or NO car!

'72 'Cuda 340, white on white
'72 Sebring; bracket project
'64 Imperial Crown black on black
'66 Imperial Crown; parts car